David Bourget (Western Ontario)
David Chalmers (ANU, NYU)
Rafael De Clercq
Jack Alan Reynolds
Learn more about PhilPapers
Bioethics Quarterly 3 (2):112-127 (1981)
The public debate on recombinant DNA research has ended even though significant issues of public interest remain undecided or untouched. The reason for the termination of other than muted public discussion is not simply the removal of an initial fear of catastrophic biohazards. With the cessation of public debate over such hazards came also the dissolution of most public forums. The ends to which recombinant DNA research and development ought to be directed are not matters of public debate. With the transfer of basic research knowledge to the private sector, that sector's proprietary interests and ownership prerogatives effectively deny any continued public participation in charting the future of genesplicing technology and its application
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
|Through your library|
References found in this work BETA
No references found.
Citations of this work BETA
No citations found.
Similar books and articles
Stephen P. Stich (1978). The Recombinant DNA Debate. Philosophy and Public Affairs 7 (3):187-205.
Sanford A. Lakoff (1980). Moral Responsibility and the "Galilean Imperative":A Double Image of the Double Helix: The Recombinant DNA Debate. Clifford Grobstein; Regulation of Scientific Inquiry: Social Concerns with Research. Keith M. Wulff; Recombinant DNA: Science, Ethics, and Politics. John Richards; The Recombinant DNA Debate. David A. Jackson, Stephen P. Stich; A Nation of Guinea Pigs: The Unknown Risks of Chemical Technology. Marshall S. Shapo; Limits of Scientific Inquiry. Gerald Holton, Robert S. Morrison. [REVIEW] Ethics 91 (1):100-.
Doogab Yi (2008). Cancer, Viruses, and Mass Migration: Paul Berg's Venture Into Eukaryotic Biology and the Advent of Recombinant DNA Research and Technology, 1967-1980. [REVIEW] Journal of the History of Biology 41 (4):589 - 636.
Rosemary Robins (2003). Donald S. Fredrickson, The Recombinant DNA Controversy: A Memoir. Science, Politics and the Public Interest, 1974â1981. [REVIEW] Metascience 12 (1):63-65.
Sue Weldon, 'Public Consent' or 'Scientific Citizenship'? What Counts as Public Participation in Population-Based DNA Collections?
John M. Golden (2010). WARF's Stem Cell Patents and Tensions Between Public and Private Sector Approaches to Research. Journal of Law, Medicine and Ethics 38 (2):314-331.
Renee Kyle & Susan Dodds (2009). Avoiding Empty Rhetoric: Engaging Publics in Debates About Nanotechnologies. Science and Engineering Ethics 15 (1):81-96.
James P. Sterba (1999). Reconciling Public Reason and Religious Values. Social Theory and Practice 25 (1):1-28.
J. J. Gamero, J. -L. Romero, J. -L. Peralta, M. Carvalho & F. Corte-Real (2007). Spanish Public Awareness Regarding DNA Profile Databases in Forensic Genetics: What Type of DNA Profiles Should Be Included? Journal of Medical Ethics 33 (10):598-604.
Runa Sarkar (2007). Policy Approaches to Induce Corporate Social Responsibility in Public and Private-Sector Firms in Developing Countries. International Corporate Responsibility Series 3:231-252.
Kevin Stoker & Megan Stoker (2012). The Paradox of Public Interest: How Serving Individual Superior Interests Fulfill Public Relations' Obligation to the Public Interest. Journal of Mass Media Ethics 27 (1):31-45.
Sorry, there are not enough data points to plot this chart.
Added to index2010-08-24
Total downloads1 ( #438,484 of 1,101,086 )
Recent downloads (6 months)1 ( #290,337 of 1,101,086 )
How can I increase my downloads?