The Indirect Perception of Distance: Interpretive Complexities in Berkeley's Theory of Vision
Kritike 1 (2) (2007)
| Abstract | This article has no associated abstract. (fix it) | |||||||||
| Keywords | No keywords specified (fix it) | |||||||||
| Categories | ||||||||||
| Options |
|
|||||||||
Download options| PhilPapers Archive |
Upload a copy of this paper Check publisher's policy on self-archival Papers currently archived: 5,711 |
| External links |
  Try with proxy. |
| Through your library | Configure |
Similar books and articlesGeorges Dicker (1982). The Concept of Immediate Perception and Berkeley's Immaterialism. In Colin M. Turbayne (ed.), Berkeley: Critical and Interpretive Essays.
Goerge Pappas (1982). Berkeley, Perception, and Common Sense. In Colin M. Turbayne (ed.), Berkeley: Critical and Interpretive Essays. University of Minnesota Press.
Akira Hara (2004). Depth and Distance in Berkeley's Theory of Vision. History of Philosophy Quarterly 21 (1):101 - 117.
Robert Schwartz (1996). Directed Perception. Philosophical Psychology 9 (1):81-91.
Margaret Atherton (1990). Berkeley's Revolution in Vision. Cornell University Press.
A. David Kline (1980). Berkeley, Pitcher, and Distance Perception. International Studies in Philosophy 12 (2):1-8.
Robert Schwartz (1994). Vision: Variations on Some Berkeleian Themes. Cambridge: Blackwell.
M. H. Pirenne (1953). Physiological Mechanisms in the Perception of Distance by Sight and Berkeley's Theory of Vision. British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 4 (13):13-21.
Helen E. Ross (2001). Berkeley, Helmholtz, the Moon Illusion, and Two Visual Systems. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 25 (1):116-117.
Analytics
Monthly downloads |
Added to index2010-08-10Total downloads23 ( #53,955 of 551,105 )Recent downloads (6 months)1 ( #63,341 of 551,105 )How can I increase my downloads? |
My notes
Discussion
