David Bourget (Western Ontario)
David Chalmers (ANU, NYU)
Rafael De Clercq
Jack Alan Reynolds
Learn more about PhilPapers
Philosophy 41 (155):1 - 18 (1966)
I propose to bring fresh evidence here for my theory of knowledge and expand it in new directions. We shall arrive most swiftly at the centre of the theory, by going back to the point from which I started about twenty years ago. Upon examining the grounds on which science is pursued, I saw that its progress is determined at every stage by indefinable powers of thought. No rules can account for the way a good idea is found for starting an inquiry; and there are no firm rules either for the verification or the refutation of the proposed solution of a problem. Rules widely current may be plausible enough, but scientific enquiry often proceeds and triumphs by contradicting them. Moreover, the explicit content of a theory fails to account for the guidance it affords to future discoveries. To hold a natural law to be true, is to believe that its presence may reveal itself in yet unknown and perhaps yet unthinkable consequences; it is to believe that such laws are features of a reality which as such will continue to bear consequences inexhaustibly
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
No categories specified
(categorize this paper)
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
|Through your library|
References found in this work BETA
No references found.
Citations of this work BETA
Sandro Tsang (2015). Arrow Physicians: Are Economics and Medicine Philosophically Incompatible? Journal of Evaluation in Clinical Practice 21 (3):419-426.
Rodrigo Ribeiro (2013). Tacit Knowledge Management. Phenomenology and the Cognitive Sciences 12 (2):337-366.
Sinead Somers & Larry Stapleton (2014). E-Agricultural Innovation Using a Human-Centred Systems Lens, Proposed Conceptual Framework. AI and Society 29 (2):193-202.
Garry Young (2009). Case Study Evidence for an Irreducible Form of Knowing How To: An Argument Against a Reductive Epistemology. Philosophia 37 (2):341-360.
S. R. Jha (1997). A New Interpretation of Michael Polanyi's Theory of Tacit Knowing: Integrative Philosophy with 'Intellectual Passions'. Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part A 28 (4):611-631.
Similar books and articles
Walter van Herck (1999). The Role Of Tacit Knowledge In Religion. Tradition and Discovery 26 (2):21-30.
Ronald Fagin, Joseph Y. Halpern & Moshe Y. Vardi (1992). What is an Inference Rule? Journal of Symbolic Logic 57 (3):1018-1045.
Keith Frankish (2005). Non-Monotonic Inference. In Alex Barber (ed.), Encyclopedia of Language and Linguistics. Elsevier
Jonathan Perraton & Iona Tarrant (2007). What Does Tacit Knowledge Actually Explain? Journal of Economic Methodology 14 (3):353-370.
David A. Stone (2013). The Experience of the Tacit in Multi- and Interdisciplinary Collaboration. Phenomenology and the Cognitive Sciences 12 (2):289-308.
Walter B. Gulick (2006). Signals, Schemas, Subsidiaries, and Skills. Tradition and Discovery 33 (3):44-62.
Tim Ray (2009). Rethinking Polanyi's Concept of Tacit Knowledge: From Personal Knowing to Imagined Institutions. [REVIEW] Minerva 47 (1):75-92.
Dale Cannon (2002). Construing Polanyi's Tacit Knowing as Knowing by Acquaintance Rather Than Knowing by Representation. Tradition and Discovery 29 (2):26-43.
Charles Lowney (2011). Ineffable, Tacit, Explicable and Explicit. Tradition and Discovery 38 (1):18-37.
Stephen G. Henry (2011). A Clinical Perspective on Tacit Knowledge and Its Varieties. Tradition and Discovery 38 (1):13-17.
Added to index2010-08-10
Total downloads37 ( #88,087 of 1,725,584 )
Recent downloads (6 months)2 ( #268,736 of 1,725,584 )
How can I increase my downloads?