Robots aren't the only physical models

Behavioral and Brain Sciences 24 (6):1069-1070 (2001)
Webb compares robots to other behavior models in a novel space, but neglects significant portions of this space. The article's analysis of models would have been strengthened by including a broader coverage of physically embodied models and of models of social behavior. Nevertheless, Webb is correct to claim that robot construction will contribute to understanding behavior.
Keywords No keywords specified (fix it)
Categories (categorize this paper)
 Save to my reading list
Follow the author(s)
My bibliography
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Revision history Request removal from index
Download options
PhilPapers Archive

Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy on self-archival     Papers currently archived: 9,360
External links
  • Through your library Configure
    References found in this work BETA

    No references found.

    Citations of this work BETA

    No citations found.

    Similar books and articles
    George N. Reeke (2001). Modelling Criteria: Not Just for Robots. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 24 (6):1074-1075.
    Steven Rappaport (2001). Economic Models as Mini-Theories. Journal of Economic Methodology 8 (2):275-285.
    Barbara Webb (2001). Robots Can Be (Good) Models. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 24 (6):1081-1087.
    Ronald N. Giere (2001). The Nature and Function of Models. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 24 (6):1060-1060.
    Peter R. Killeen (2001). Doing Versus Knowing. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 24 (6):1063-1064.
    Jeffrey Koperski, Models. Internet Encyclopedia of Philosophy.

    Monthly downloads

    Sorry, there are not enough data points to plot this chart.

    Added to index


    Total downloads


    Recent downloads (6 months)


    How can I increase my downloads?

    My notes
    Sign in to use this feature

    Start a new thread
    There  are no threads in this forum
    Nothing in this forum yet.