David Bourget (Western Ontario)
David Chalmers (ANU, NYU)
Rafael De Clercq
Jack Alan Reynolds
Learn more about PhilPapers
Science as Salvation discusses the high spiritual ambitions which tend to gather round the notion of science. Officially, science claims only the modest function of establishing facts. Yet people still hope for something much grander from it--namely, the myths by which to shape and support life in an increasingly confusing age. Our faith in science is abused by some scientists whose adolescent fantasies have spilled over into their professional lives. Salvation, immortality, mastery of the universe, humans without bodies, and intelligent self-reproducing computers are just some of the notions and speculations that are now found--not on the pages of science fiction--but on the pages of science itself. The danger is that these concepts are given to a myth-hungry public who turn to science now that religion has lost its ability to create myth. Science as Salvation discusses the function and meaning of such fantasies. Midgley examines the need for and the use of myth in science, and how science and religion are related. She argues that we need to develop a realistic understanding of scientific imagination and its importance. Taking them seriously as symptoms of a genuine myth-hunger, it suggests that the proper function of science may need to include wider perspectives, which would make it plain that such desperate, compensatory dramas are unnecessary.
|Keywords||Science Philosophy Religion and science|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
|Buy the book||$4.45 used (89% off) $10.95 new (73% off) $37.95 direct from Amazon (6% off) Amazon page|
|Call number||Q175.M613 1992|
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
|Through your library|
References found in this work BETA
No references found.
Citations of this work BETA
Willem B. Drees (2005). "Religion and Science" as Advocacy of Science and as Religion Versus Religion. Zygon 40 (3):545-554.
Nancey Murphy (2010). Robert John Russell Versus the New Atheists. Zygon 45 (1):193-212.
Gregory R. Peterson (2003). Demarcation and the Scientistic Fallacy. Zygon 38 (4):751-761.
Fraser Watts (2013). Embodied Cognition and Religion. Zygon 48 (3):745-758.
Darcia Narvaez (2013). The Future of Research in Moral Development and Education. Journal of Moral Education 42 (1):1-11.
Similar books and articles
Philip Kitcher (1993). The Advancement of Science: Science Without Legend, Objectivity Without Illusions. Oxford University Press.
Philip Hefner (2010). Embodied Science: Recentering Religion-and-Science. Zygon 45 (1):251-263.
Mark Vernon (2007). Science, Religion, and the Meaning of Life. Palgrave Macmillan.
Samir Okasha (2002). Philosophy of Science: A Very Short Introduction. Oxford University Press.
William Desmond, John Steffen & Koen Decoster (eds.) (2001). Beyond Conflict and Reduction: Between Philosophy, Science, and Religion. Leuven University Press.
Massimo Pigliucci (2010). Nonsense on Stilts: How to Tell Science From Bunk. University of Chicago Press.
Massimo Pigliucci (2013). When Science Studies Religion: Six Philosophy Lessons for Science Classes. Science and Education 22 (1):49-67.
Bryan Appleyard (2004). Understanding the Present: An Alternative History of Science. Distributed in the U.S.A. And in Canada by Palgrave Macmillan.
John Hedley Brooke & Ian Maclean (eds.) (2005). Heterodoxy in Early Modern Science and Religion. Oxford University Press.
Added to index2009-01-28
Total downloads50 ( #60,853 of 1,707,716 )
Recent downloads (6 months)4 ( #160,112 of 1,707,716 )
How can I increase my downloads?