When foods become animals: Ruminations on Ethics and Responsibility in Care- full practices of consumption
David Bourget (Western Ontario)
David Chalmers (ANU, NYU)
Rafael De Clercq
Jack Alan Reynolds
Learn more about PhilPapers
Ethics, Policy and Environment 13 (2):171-190 (2011)
Providing information to consumers in the form of food labels about modern systems of animal farming is believed to be crucial for increasing their awareness of animal suffering and for promoting technological change towards more welfare-friendly forms of husbandry (CIWF, 2007). In this paper we want to explore whether and how food labels carrying information about the lives of animals are used by consumers while shopping for meat and other animal foods. In order to achieve this, we draw upon a series of focus group discussions that were held in Italy as part of a large EU funded project (Welfare Quality?). In the focus group discussions we addressed how, when or if, claims made about the lives of animals on food labels intervened in what the participants bought and ate. We contend that such labels bring the lives of animals to the forefront and act as new ?subjectifiers? (Latour, 2005: 212) that offer a new tool for becoming an ?ethically competent consumer?, who cares about the lives of animals while shopping for food. However, this offer is not always easily accommodated within existing competences and previous commitments, as it requires a reassessment of existing, and often intimate, practices of shopping, cooking and eating. We argue that new labels carrying welfare claims, with their intention of increasing market transparency, produce two contrasting outcomes: they open new spaces of action, which offer an opportunity for investing in new competences and for engaging with animal welfare issues, in short, they allow an ?ethically competent consumer? to emerge, but they also produce another outcome, or a collateral casualty (Bauman, 2007), namely the ethically non-competent consumer. ?In daily matters, be competent? (From How to live ethically, the Tao Te Ching)
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
|Through your library|
References found in this work BETA
No references found.
Citations of this work BETA
Christine Parker, Carly Brunswick & Jane Kotey (2013). The Happy Hen on Your Supermarket Shelf. Journal of Bioethical Inquiry 10 (2):165-186.
Similar books and articles
Nicholas H. Steneck (1997). Role of the Institutional Animal Care and Use Committee in Monitoring Research. Ethics and Behavior 7 (2):173 – 184.
Kay Peggs (2012). Animals and Sociology. Palgrave Macmillan.
Johan de Tavernier (2012). Food Citizenship: Is There a Duty for Responsible Consumption? [REVIEW] Journal of Agricultural and Environmental Ethics 25 (6):895-907.
Farol N. Tomson (1989). Approving the Use of Animals in Medical Education. Theoretical Medicine and Bioethics 10 (1).
Monique Lanoix (2010). Triangulating Care. International Journal of Feminist Approaches to Bioethics 3 (1):138-157.
Robert-Jan Geerts (2012). Self-Practices and the Experiential Gap. Techné: Research in Philosophy and Technology 16 (2):94-104.
David Lulka (2008). The Ethics of Extension: Philosophical Speculation on Nonhuman Animals. Ethics, Place and Environment 11 (2):157 – 180.
Maurice Hamington (2008). Learning Ethics From Our Relationships with Animals. International Journal of Applied Philosophy 22 (2):177-188.
Lisa H. Newton (1982). Collective Responsibility in Health Care. Journal of Medicine and Philosophy 7 (1):11-22.
Iain A. Davies, Zoe Lee & Ine Ahonkhai (2012). Do Consumers Care About Ethical-Luxury? Journal of Business Ethics 106 (1):37-51.
Mark Coeckelbergh (2010). Health Care, Capabilities, and Ai Assistive Technologies. Ethical Theory and Moral Practice 13 (2):181 - 190.
Stephen Wilmot (2000). Corporate Moral Responsibility in Health Care. Medicine, Health Care and Philosophy 3 (2):139-146.
Kirsty Best (2004). Interfacing the Environment: Networked Screens and the Ethics of Visual Consumption. Ethics and the Environment 9 (2):65-85.
Kirsten Hansen (2004). Does Autonomy Count in Favor of Labeling Genetically Modified Food? Journal of Agricultural and Environmental Ethics 17 (1):67-76.
Paul M. Gurney & M. Humphreys (2006). Consuming Responsibility: The Search for Value at Laskarina Holidays. Journal of Business Ethics 64 (1):83 - 100.
Added to index2010-10-22
Total downloads9 ( #152,927 of 1,096,840 )
Recent downloads (6 months)1 ( #273,068 of 1,096,840 )
How can I increase my downloads?