Public Negative Emotions and the Judicial Review of Transitional Justice Bills: Lessons from Three Contexts
David Bourget (Western Ontario)
David Chalmers (ANU, NYU)
Rafael De Clercq
Jack Alan Reynolds
Learn more about PhilPapers
Papeles Del Centro de Estudios Sobre la Identidad Colectiva 60:1-29 (2010)
This article seeks to examine the ways in which courts of constitutional review have tried to deal with public sentiments within societies emerging from large-scale oppression and conflict. A comparative analysis of judicial review decisions from post-communist Hungary, post-apartheid South Africa and post-dictatorial Argentina is meant to show-case how judges have, more or less successfully, recognised and pedagogically engaged social negative feelings of resentment and indignation towards former victimisers and beneficiaries of violence. Thus, the article hopes to pave the way for more in-depth research on one of the most neglected dimensions of post-conflict societies: public affect.
|Keywords||judicial review transitional justice emotions|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
|Through your library|
References found in this work BETA
No references found.
Citations of this work BETA
No citations found.
Similar books and articles
Mihaela Mihai (2010). Transitional Justice and the Quest for Democracy: A Contribution to a Political Theory of Democratic Transformations. Ratio Juris 23 (2):183-204.
Mihaela Mihai (2010). Criminal Trials in Transitional Periods and the Challenge of Emotions: Stories From Two Countries. Revista Crítica de Ciências Sociais 88:155-184.
Mihaela Mihai (2011). Socialising Negative Emotions: Transitional Criminal Trials in the Service of Democracy&Quot;. Oxford Journal of Legal Studies 31 (1):111–131.
Claudio Corradetti (2011). Transitional Justice and the Truth-Constraints of the Public Sphere. Philosophy and Social Criticism 38 (7):685-700.
Jamie Terence Kelly (2010). Transitional Justice and Equality: A Response to Eisikovits. Review of International Affairs 61 (1138-1139):190-196.
Bradley W. Miller (2007). Review Essay: A Common Law Theory of Judicial Review by WJ Waluchow. American Journal of Jurisprudence 52.
Shruti Rana, 'Streamlining' the Rule of Law: How the Department of Justice is Undermining Judicial Review of Agency Action.
Marion Smiley (2001). Democratic Justice in Transition. Michigan Law Review 99 (6):1332-1347.
A. Harel (2003). Rights-Based Judicial Review: A Democratic Justification. [REVIEW] Law and Philosophy 22 (s 3-4):247-276.
Marcus G. Singer (1983). Judicial Decisions and Judicial Opinions: Relations Between Law, Justice, and Morality. Criminal Justice Ethics 2 (1):17-30.
Mihaela Mihai (2011). Emotions and the Criminal Law. Philosophy Compass 6 (9):599-610.
Liviu Damsa (2011). Lustration (Administrative Justice) and Closure in Post–Communist East Central Europe. International Journal of Public Law and Policy 4 (1):335-375.
Lawrence M. Frankel, Rethinking the Tunney Act: A Model for Judicial Review of Antitrust Consent Decrees.
Added to index2012-10-18
Total downloads3 ( #313,706 of 1,140,179 )
Recent downloads (6 months)1 ( #142,694 of 1,140,179 )
How can I increase my downloads?