Graduate studies at Western
Oxford Journal of Legal Studies 31 (1):111–131 (2011)
|Abstract||This paper seeks to contribute to the field of transitional justice by adding new insights about the role that trials of victimizers can play within democratization processes. The main argument is that criminal proceedings affirming the value of equal respect and concern for both victims and abusers can contribute to the socialization of citizens’ politically relevant emotions. More precisely, using law constructively to engage public resentment and indignation can be successful to the extent that legality is not sacrificed. In order to locate this argument within the rich literature on the pedagogical functions of transitional trials this paper enters a dialogue with three emblematic texts. Lawrence Douglas’s narrative jurisprudence approach, Judith Shklar’s critique of the limits of legalism, and Marc Osiel’s interest in ‘discursive solidarity’ represent starting points for a more complex conceptualization of the relationship between democracy, law and emotional education within transformational periods.|
|Keywords||transitional justice emotions criminal trials|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
|Through your library||Configure|
Similar books and articles
Mihaela Mihai (2010). Criminal Trials in Transitional Periods and the Challenge of Emotions: Stories From Two Countries. Revista Crítica de Ciências Sociais 88:155-184.
Mihaela Mihai (2010). Transitional Justice and the Quest for Democracy: A Contribution to a Political Theory of Democratic Transformations. Ratio Juris 23 (2):183-204.
Mihaela Mihai (2011). Emotions and the Criminal Law. Philosophy Compass 6 (9):599-610.
Robert Weisberg (1995). Review Essay / Victims' Rights in Criminal Trials. Criminal Justice Ethics 14 (2):56-62.
Mihaela Mihai (2010). Public Negative Emotions and the Judicial Review of Transitional Justice Bills: Lessons From Three Contexts. Papeles Del Centro de Estudios Sobre la Identidad Colectiva 60:1-29.
Jamie Terence Kelly (2010). Transitional Justice and Equality: A Response to Eisikovits. Review of International Affairs 61 (1138-1139):190-196.
Andrew Ashworth & Lucia Zedner (2008). Defending the Criminal Law: Reflections on the Changing Character of Crime, Procedure, and Sanctions. Criminal Law and Philosophy 2 (1):21-51.
Marion Smiley (2001). Democratic Justice in Transition. Michigan Law Review 99 (6):1332-1347.
Larry Laudan (2008). The Elementary Epistemic Arithmetic of Criminal Justice. Episteme 5 (3):pp. 282-294.
René Foqué (2008). Criminal Justice in a Democracy: Towards a Relational Conception of Criminal Law and Punishment. [REVIEW] Criminal Law and Philosophy 2 (3):207-227.
M. P. Charlesworth (1937). Criminal Law Under Tiberius Robert Samuel Rogers: Criminal Trials and Criminal Legislation Under Tiberius. Pp. X+216. Middletown, Conn.: The American Philological Association, 1935. Cloth. [REVIEW] The Classical Review 51 (01):31-32.
Claudio Corradetti (2011). Transitional Justice and the Truth-Constraints of the Public Sphere. Philosophy and Social Criticism 38 (7):685-700.
Sorry, there are not enough data points to plot this chart.
Added to index2011-05-06
Total downloads1 ( #292,563 of 739,395 )
Recent downloads (6 months)1 ( #61,680 of 739,395 )
How can I increase my downloads?