David Bourget (Western Ontario)
David Chalmers (ANU, NYU)
Rafael De Clercq
Ezio Di Nucci
Jack Alan Reynolds
Learn more about PhilPapers
Social Theory and Practice 38 (3):483-503 (2012)
The paper examines the so-called principle of all-affected interests (PAAI), which holds that political decisions ought to be made in such a manner that all those whose interests are affected by them have appropriate opportunity to participate in them. In conjunction with factual observations regarding global economic interdependence, the PAAI is frequently proposed as the normative premise of arguments for global democracy. The paper argues that these arguments underspecify the supposed wrong of affectedness. It argues that the perceived wrongness of some situations of being affected without an opportunity to participate can be fully captured in terms of inequality rather than exclusion.
|Keywords||political philosophy global democracy equality|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
|Through your library|
References found in this work BETA
No references found.
Citations of this work BETA
No citations found.
Similar books and articles
Omar Dahbour (2006). Is “Globalizing Democracy” Possible? Radical Philosophy Today 2006:255-260.
Eric Cavallero (2009). Federative Global Democracy. Metaphilosophy 40 (1):42-64.
Gillian Brock (2005). The Difference Principle, Equality of Opportunity, and Cosmopolitan Justice. Journal of Moral Philosophy 2 (3):333-351.
Thom Brooks (2007). Equality and Democracy. Ethical Perspectives 14 (1):3-12.
Fabienne Peter (2007). The Political Egalitarian's Dilemma. Ethical Theory and Moral Practice 10 (4):373 - 387.
Mark Navin (2008). Fair Equality of Opportunity in Global Justice. Social Philosophy Today 24:39-52.
K. Brad Wray (2001). Science, Biases, and the Threat of Global Pessimism. Proceedings of the Philosophy of Science Association 2001 (3):S467-.
Rodney G. Peffer (2008). A Modified Rawlsian Theory of Social Justice: “Justice as Fair Rights”. Proceedings of the Xxii World Congress of Philosophy 50:593-608.
David Miller (2005). Against Global Egalitarianism. Journal of Ethics 9 (1-2):55 - 79.
Gillian Brock (2005). Egalitarianism, Ideals, and Cosmopolitan Justice. Philosophical Forum 36 (1):1–30.
David Owen (2012). Constituting the Polity, Constituting the Demos: On the Place of the All Affected Interests Principle in Democratic Theory and in Resolving the Democratic Boundary Problem. Ethics and Global Politics 5 (3):129-152.
Eva Erman (2011). Human Rights Do Not Make Global Democracy. Contemporary Political Theory 10 (4):463.
Margaret R. Moore (2007). Justice Within Different Borders: A Review of Caney's Global Political Theory. [REVIEW] Journal of Global Ethics 3 (2):255 – 268.
Thomas Christiano (2010). The Constitution of Equality: Democratic Authority and its Limits. OUP Oxford.
Merten Reglitz (2011). Global Egalitarianism as a Practice-Independent Ideal. Dissertation, University of Warwick
Added to index2012-08-15
Total downloads10 ( #324,403 of 1,792,839 )
Recent downloads (6 months)3 ( #282,371 of 1,792,839 )
How can I increase my downloads?