David Bourget (Western Ontario)
David Chalmers (ANU, NYU)
Rafael De Clercq
Ezio Di Nucci
Jack Alan Reynolds
Learn more about PhilPapers
Philosophical Frontiers 5 (1):73-83 (2010)
In literary aesthetics, the debate on whether literary fictions provide propositional knowledge generally centres around the question whether there are authors’ explicit or implicit truth-claims in literary works and whether the reader’s act of looking for and assessing such claims as true or false is an appropriate stance toward the works as literary works. Nevertheless, in reading literary fiction, readers cannot always be sure whether the author is actually asserting or suggesting a view she expresses or presents because of the artistic and imaginative nature of the work. In this essay, I shall argue that in addition to asserting and suggesting, authors make use of a third way of conveying knowledge by their works: they invite the reader to genuinely or extra-fictionally contemplate unasserted thoughts or viewpoints to a given issue, or they offer hypotheses or provide the reader fictional material for constructing a hypothesis. The aim of this essay is to examine this rather unanalyzed but extremely wide grey zone: the author’s act of ‘contemplating’ and the cognitive value of its products which I shall call ‘literary hypotheses.’
|Keywords||literature fiction cognitive value knowledge hypothesis contemplation|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
|Through your library|
References found in this work BETA
No references found.
Citations of this work BETA
No citations found.
Similar books and articles
Jukka Mikkonen (2013). The Cognitive Value of Philosophical Fiction. Bloomsbury Academic.
Jukka Mikkonen (2010). On the Body of Literary Persuasion. Estetika 47 (1):51-71.
Jukka Mikkonen (2009). Truth-Claiming in Fiction: Towards a Poetics of Literary Assertion. Nordic Journal of Aesthetics 38 (18):34.
John Gibson (2003). Between Truth and Triviality. British Journal of Aesthetics 43 (3):224-237.
Jukka Mikkonen (2009). Assertions in Literary Fiction. Minerva 13:144-180.
Jukka Mikkonen, Implicit Assertions in Literary Fiction. Proceedings of the European Society for Aesthetics, vol. 2.
Jukka Mikkonen (2010). Sutrop on Literary Fiction-Making: Defending Currie. Disputatio 3 (28):151-157.
Jukka Mikkonen (2008). Philosophical Fiction and the Act of Fiction-Making. SATS: Northern European Journal of Philosophy 9 (2):116-132.
Jukka Mikkonen (2009). The Realistic Fallacy, Or: The Conception of Literary Narrative Fiction in Analytic Aesthetics. Studia Philosophica Estonica 2 (1):1-18.
Jukka Mikkonen (2010). Literary Fictions as Utterances and Artworks. Theoria 46 (1):68-80.
Peter Lamarque & Stein Haugom Olsen (1994). Truth, Fiction, and Literature: A Philosophical Perspective. Oxford University Press.
Weronika Chańska (1997). Czy fikcja może być prawdziwa? Filozofia Nauki 4.
Bijoy H. Boruah (1988). Fiction and Emotion: A Study in Aesthetics and the Philosophy of Mind. Oxford University Press.
Jukka Mikkonen (2009). Intentions and Interpretations: Philosophical Fiction as Conversation. Contemporary Aesthetics 7.
Added to index2010-08-25
Total downloads19 ( #203,823 of 1,911,817 )
Recent downloads (6 months)1 ( #458,984 of 1,911,817 )
How can I increase my downloads?