In Alexander Hieke & Hannes Leitgeb (eds.), Reduction and Elimination in Philosophy and the Sciences. Papers of the 31st International Wittgenstein Symposium. Austrian Ludwig Wittgenstein Society (2008)
|Abstract||Many philosophers use “physicalism” and “naturalism” interchangeably. In this paper, I will distinguish ontological naturalism from physicalism. While broad versions of physicalism are compatible with naturalism, naturalism doesn't have to be committed to strong versions of physical reductionism, so it cannot be defined as equivalent to it. Instead of relying on the notion of ideal physics, naturalism can refer to the notion of ideal natural science that doesn't imply unity of science. The notion of ideal natural science, as well as the notion of ideal physics, will be vindicated. I will shortly explicate the notion of ideal natural science, and define ontological naturalism based on it.|
|Keywords||ontological naturalism physicalism Hempel's dilemma|
|Through your library||Configure|
Similar books and articles
Michael C. Rea (2002). World Without Design: The Ontological Consequences of Naturalism. Oxford University Press.
David Macarthur (2008). Quinean Naturalism in Question. Philo 11 (1):5-18.
Patrick Dieveney (2012). In Defense of Quinean Ontological Naturalism. Erkenntnis 76 (2):225-242.
Jon Jacobs, Naturalism. Internet Encyclopedia of Philosophy.
Jason Megill (2007). Naturalism, Physicalism and Epiphenomenalism. Philosophical Psychology 20 (6):681 – 686.
Stuart Silvers (1997). Nonreductive Naturalism. Theoria 12 (28):163-84.
Added to index2009-04-30
Total downloads138 ( #3,073 of 549,070 )
Recent downloads (6 months)28 ( #1,657 of 549,070 )
How can I increase my downloads?