David Bourget (Western Ontario)
David Chalmers (ANU, NYU)
Rafael De Clercq
Jack Alan Reynolds
Learn more about PhilPapers
Proceedings of the International Association for Business and Society 19:421-431 (2008)
This study was conducted with the aim of outlining a comprehensive picture of the coverage of various sustainability schemes or criteria sets related to the entire value-added chain of biomass and bioenergy and comparing them accordingly. Eight sustainability schemes and one draft directive were chosen for the qualitative comparison: two existing sets of criteria for agricultural biomass (RSPO, RTRS); two existing forest certification schemes (FSC, Finnish FFCS); two newly developed initiatives for biomass for energy raw material (WWF Meta standard, CSB); and three recent proposals for bio energy and biofuels (SSB, Finnish SLF, EU draft directive).The analysis demonstrated that five schemes (RSPO, RTRS, FSC, CSB and SSB) are created for global application and commonly cover all sustainability issues plus the legal framework around it. The WWF Meta standard does also cover all issues, although the economic items are underemphasised. The two Finnish sets (FFCS and SLF) are mainly locally or regionally applied and focus more on environmental issues, as other issues are covered by existing legislation. The EU draft directive focuses mainly on the governance of energy from renewable sources at the European level, emphasising environmental issues. This paper resulted in the proposal of a tri-dimensional approach (sustainability issues; technical biomass conversion routes; physical trade flows) when comparing various biomass and bioenergy schemes and for further development and empirical testing of overall European biomass and bioenergy sustainability
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
|Through your library|
References found in this work BETA
No references found.
Citations of this work BETA
No citations found.
Similar books and articles
Nada Langova, Jozef Suchomel, Otto Barborak & Jozef Viglasky (2009). Status and Vision for the Biomass-To-Energy Sector. World Futures 65 (5):389-405.
Donald H. Schepers (2010). Challenges to Legitimacy at the Forest Stewardship Council. Journal of Business Ethics 92 (2):279 - 290.
Elzbieta Gula & Arkadiusz Figorski (2009). Optimization of Use of Public Funds for Promotion of The Rational Use of Energy and Renewable Energy Sources: The Example of Poland. World Futures 65 (5):417-426.
Arkadiusz Figorski & Elzbieta Gula (2009). Optimization of Use of Public Funds for Promotion of The Rational Use of Energy and Renewable Energy Sources: The Example of Poland. World Futures 65 (5):417-426.
John Gowdy (2001). Strong Versus Weak Sustainability. Environmental Ethics 23 (2):155-168.
Robert Ayres, Jeroen van den Berrgh & John Gowdy (2001). Strong Versus Weak Sustainability: Economics, Natural Sciences, and Consilience. Environmental Ethics 23 (2):155-168.
Sanya Carley (2011). Normative Dimensions of Sustainable Energy Policy. Ethics, Policy and Environment 14 (2):211 - 229.
Yvonne M. Scherrer (2009). Environmental Conservation NGOs and the Concept of Sustainable Development: A Research Into the Value Systems of Greenpeace International, WWF International and IUCN International. Journal of Business Ethics 85 (3):555 - 571.
Lawrence J. Lad (2010). The Food Industry and Sustainability. Proceedings of the International Association for Business and Society 21:121-123.
Matias Laine (2007). Sustainable Development? Business Rhetoric of Sustainability in Finnish Corporate Disclosures 1985-2005. Proceedings of the International Association for Business and Society 18:197-202.
Daryl Koehn (2001). Ethical Issues Connected with Multi-Level Marketing Schemes. Journal of Business Ethics 29 (1-2):153 - 160.
Lisa Calvano (2007). Promoting Sustainability Through Community-Based Enterprise in Ecuador. Proceedings of the International Association for Business and Society 18:301-305.
D. Peter Stonehouse (2000). A Review of WTO and Environmental Issues. [REVIEW] Journal of Agricultural and Environmental Ethics 13 (1):121-144.
Sorry, there are not enough data points to plot this chart.
Added to index2012-03-18
Total downloads1 ( #434,535 of 1,098,955 )
Recent downloads (6 months)1 ( #287,052 of 1,098,955 )
How can I increase my downloads?