Intentions and Interpretations: Philosophical Fiction as Conversation
Contemporary Aesthetics 7 (2009)
| Abstract | Appeals to the actual author's intention in order to legitimate an interpretation of a work of literary narrative fiction have generally been considered extraneous in Anglo-American philosophy of literature since Wimsatt and Beardsley's well-known manifesto from the 1940s. For over sixty years now so-called anti-intentionalists have argued that the author's intentions – plans, aims, and purposes considering her work – are highly irrelevant to interpretation. In this paper, I shall argue that the relevance of the actual author's intentions varies in different approaches to fiction, and suggest that fictions are legitimately interpreted intentionally as conversations in a certain kind of reading. My aim is to show that the so-called conversational approach is valid when emphasizing the cognitive content of a fiction and truths it seem to convey, for example, in a philosophical approach to fictions which contain philosophical purport using Sartre's fictional works as paradigmatic, and that anti-intentionalists' arguments against intentionalism do not threaten such an approach. | |||||||||
| Keywords | actual intentionalism anti-intentionalism conversation fiction hypothetical intentionalism intention interpretation philosophy | |||||||||
| Categories | ||||||||||
| Options |
|
|||||||||
Download options| PhilPapers Archive |
Upload a copy of this paper Check publisher's policy on self-archival Papers currently archived: 5,672 |
| External links |
  Try with proxy. |
| Through your library | Configure |
Similar books and articlesGary Iseminger (1996). Actual Intentionalism Vs. Hypothetical Intentionalism. Journal of Aesthetics and Art Criticism 54 (4):319-326.
Hans Maes (2010). Intention, Interpretation and Contemporary Visual Art. British Journal of Aesthetics 50 (2):121-138.
No��L. Carroll (2000). Interpretation and Intention: The Debate Between Hypothetical and Actual Intentionalism. Metaphilosophy 31 (1-2):75-95.
Sherri Irvin (2009). Teaching and Learning Guide For: Authors, Intentions and Literary Meaning. Philosophy Compass 4 (1):287-291.
James A. E. Macpherson (2010). Legislative Intentionalism and Proxy Agency. Law and Philosophy 29 (1):1-29.
Jukka Mikkonen (2009). Truth-Claiming in Fiction: Towards a Poetics of Literary Assertion. Nordic Journal of Aesthetics 38 (18):34.
Sheila Lintott (2002). When Artists Fail: A Reply to Trivedi. British Journal of Aesthetics 42 (1):64-72.
Jukka Mikkonen (2008). Philosophical Fiction and the Act of Fiction-Making. SATS 9 (2):116-132.
Vivienne Brown (2007). Historical Interpretation, Intentionalism and Philosophy of Mind. Journal of the Philosophy of History 1 (1):25-62.
Stephen Davies (2006). Authors' Intentions, Literary Interpretation, and Literary Value. British Journal of Aesthetics 46 (3):223-247.
Analytics
Monthly downloads |
Added to index2009-04-16Total downloads54 ( #18,805 of 549,066 )Recent downloads (6 months)6 ( #12,324 of 549,066 )How can I increase my downloads? |
My notes
Discussion
