Implicit Assertions in Literary Fiction
Graduate studies at Western
Proceedings of the European Society for Aesthetics, vol. 2 (forthcoming)
|Abstract||In analytic aesthetics, a popular ‘cognitivist’ line of thought maintains that literary works of fictional kind may ‘imply’ or ‘suggest’ truths. Nevertheless, so-called anti-cognitivists have considered the concepts of implication and suggestion both problematic. For instance, cognitivists’s use of the word ‘implication’ seems to differ from all philosophical conceptions of implication, and ‘suggestion’ is generally left unanalysed in their theories. This paper discusses the role, kinds and conception of implication or suggestion in literature, issues which have received little attention in contemporary literary aesthetics. In the first part, the author shall examine classic views on implication in literature and introduce objections to the views. In the latter part, in turn, the author shall propose a definition of the ‘literary suggestion’ and discuss issues related to its interpretation.|
|Keywords||implication suggestion literature fiction cognitivism|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
|External links||This entry has no external links. Add one.|
|Through your library||Configure|
Similar books and articles
Jukka Mikkonen (2009). Assertions in Literary Fiction. Minerva 13:144-180.
Jukka Mikkonen (2009). Truth-Claiming in Fiction: Towards a Poetics of Literary Assertion. Nordic Journal of Aesthetics 38 (18):34.
Jukka Mikkonen (2013). The Cognitive Value of Philosophical Fiction. Bloomsbury Academic.
Jukka Mikkonen (2010). On the Body of Literary Persuasion. Estetika 47 (1):51-71.
Jukka Mikkonen (2008). Philosophical Fiction and the Act of Fiction-Making. SATS 9 (2):116-132.
Jukka Mikkonen (2010). Sutrop on Literary Fiction-Making: Defending Currie. Disputatio 3 (28):151-157.
Jukka Mikkonen (2009). The Realistic Fallacy, Or: The Conception of Literary Narrative Fiction in Analytic Aesthetics. Studia Philosophica Estonica 2 (1):1-18.
Jukka Mikkonen (2010). Contemplation and Hypotheses in Literature. Philosophical Frontiers 5 (1):73-83.
Jukka Mikkonen (2009). Intentions and Interpretations: Philosophical Fiction as Conversation. Contemporary Aesthetics 7.
Bijoy H. Boruah (1988). Fiction and Emotion: A Study in Aesthetics and the Philosophy of Mind. Oxford University Press.
Edward Harcourt (2010). Truth and the 'Work' of Literary Fiction. British Journal of Aesthetics 50 (1):93-97.
Sabrina Achilles (2012). Literature, Ethics, and Aesthetics: Applied Deleuze and Guattari. Palgrave Macmillan.
Weronika Chańska (1997). Czy fikcja może być prawdziwa? Filozofia Nauki 4.
Christian Quendler (2001). From Romantic Irony to Postmodernist Metafiction: A Contribution to the History of Literary Self-Reflexivity in its Philosophical Context. P. Lang.
Sarah E. Worth (2007). The Dangers of da Vinci, or the Power of Popular Fiction. Philosophy in the Contemporary World 14 (1):134-143.
Added to index2010-08-25
Total downloads8 ( #131,747 of 729,377 )
Recent downloads (6 months)1 ( #61,087 of 729,377 )
How can I increase my downloads?