Graduate studies at Western
Law and Philosophy 30 (3):291-317 (2011)
|Abstract||This article presents a defense of Kant’s idea of a league of states. Kant’s proposal that rightful or just international relations can be achieved within the framework of such a league is often criticized for being at odds with his overall theory. In view of the analogy he draws between an interpersonal and an international state of nature, it is often argued that he should have opted for the idea of a state of states. Agreeing with this standard criticism that a league of states cannot establish the institutional framework for international justice, others also suggest an alternative stage model interpretation. According to this interpretation, Kant’s true ideal is in fact a state of states, whereas the league is merely introduced as a temporary and second best solution. In contrast to both the standard criticism and the stage model interpretation, I argue that fundamental normative concerns count in favour of a league rather than a state of states. I also argue that Kant’s defense of such a league is consistent with his position on the institutional preconditions for just interaction in the domestic case because of crucial relevant differences between the state of nature among individuals and the external relations between states|
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
|Through your library||Configure|
Similar books and articles
Pauline Kleingeld (2004). Approaching Perpetual Peace: Kant’s Defence of a League of States and His Ideal of a World Federation. European Journal of Philosophy 12 (3):304-325.
Burleigh T. Wilkins (2007). Kant on International Relations. Journal of Ethics 11 (2):147 - 159.
PaulineKleingeld (2004). Approaching Perpetual Peace: Kant's Defence of a League of States and His Ideal of a World Federation. European Journal of Philosophy 12 (3):304–325.
Sharon Anderson-Gold (2012). Philosophers of Peace: Hobbes and Kant on International Order. Hobbes Studies 25 (1):6-20.
Nathaniel Grow, A Proper Analysis of the National Football League Under Section One of the Sherman Act.
Pauline Kleingeld (1998). Kant's Cosmopolitan Law: World Citizenship for a Global Order. Kantian Review 2:72-90.
Kenneth R. Westphal (1992). Kant on the State, Law, and Obedience to Authority in the Alleged 'Anti-Revolutionary' Writings. Journal of Philosophical Research 17:383-426.
Sylvie Loriaux (2007). Kant on International Distributive Justice. Journal of Global Ethics 3 (3):281 – 301.
Quincy Wright (1933). Book Review:The United States and the League of Nations: 1918-1920. Denna Frank Fleming. [REVIEW] Ethics 43 (3):350-.
Helga Varden (2010). Kant's Non-Absolutist Conception of Political Legitimacy – How Public Right 'Concludes' Private Right in the “Doctrine of Right”. Kant-Studien 101 (3):331-351.
M. R. King (2012). A League of Their Own? Evaluating Justifications for The Division of Sport Into 'Enhanced' and 'Unenhanced' Leagues. Sport, Ethics and Philosophy 6 (1):31-45.
David Landy (forthcoming). What Incongruent Counterparts Show. European Journal of Philosophy.
Aaron Szymkowiak (2009). Of Free Federations and World States. International Philosophical Quarterly 49 (2):185-206.
Added to index2011-03-03
Total downloads16 ( #81,761 of 726,777 )
Recent downloads (6 months)1 ( #61,087 of 726,777 )
How can I increase my downloads?