Time and History in Alois Riegl's Theory of Perception
Journal of the History of Ideas 66 (3):451-474 (2005)
| Abstract | This article has no associated abstract. (fix it) | |||||||||
| Keywords | No keywords specified (fix it) | |||||||||
| Categories | ||||||||||
| Options |
|
|||||||||
Download options| PhilPapers Archive |
Upload a copy of this paper Check publisher's policy on self-archival Papers currently archived: 5,664 |
| External links |
 |
| Through your library | Configure |
Similar books and articlesMatthew H. Erdelyi (2004). Subliminal Perception and its Cognates: Theory, Indeterminacy, and Time. Consciousness and Cognition 13 (1):73-91.
Michel Treisman (1999). The Perception of Time: Philosophical Views and Psychological Evidence. In The Arguments of Time. New York: Oxford University Press.
Howard M. Robinson (1994). Perception. New York: Routledge.
Simon Prosser (2013). Passage and Perception. Noûs 47 (1):69-84.
Vlad Ionescu (2011). Deleuze's Tensive Notion of Painting in the Light of Riegl, Wöölfflin and Worringer. Deleuze Studies 5 (1):52-62.
Bert Mosselmans (2005). Time and Value in the History of Political Economy. Foundations of Science 10 (3).
Daniel Collins-Cavanaugh (2001). The Augustinian Impact on the History of Time. Proceedings of the American Catholic Philosophical Association 75:183-196.
J. T. Fraser (1987). Time, the Familiar Stranger. University of Massachusetts Press.
Jay Hetrick (2012). What is Nomad Art? A Benjaminian Reading of Deleuze's Riegl. Deleuze Studies 6 (1):27-41.
Analytics
Monthly downloads |
Added to index2010-08-10Total downloads4 ( #178,517 of 549,014 )Recent downloads (6 months)1 ( #63,261 of 549,014 )How can I increase my downloads? |
My notes
Discussion
