David Bourget (Western Ontario)
David Chalmers (ANU, NYU)
Rafael De Clercq
Jack Alan Reynolds
Learn more about PhilPapers
Utilitas 23 (2):161-182 (2011)
This paper develops an account of how economic and political institutions can limit the applicability of principles of justice even in non-relational cosmopolitan conceptions. It shows that fundamental principles of justice underdetermine fair distributive shares as well as justice -based requirements. It argues that institutions partially constitute the content of justice by determining distributive shares and by resolving indeterminacies about justice -based requirements resulting from strategic interaction and disagreement. In the absence of existing institutions principles of justice might not be applicable for assessing distributions or guiding individual action and institutional design. Hence, accepting a specific cosmopolitan conception of justice is insufficient to settle global distributive questions.
|Keywords||global justice cosmopolitanism political institutions|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
|Through your library|
References found in this work BETA
H. L. A. Hart (1994). The Concept of Law. Oxford University Press.
John Rawls (1971/2005). A Theory of Justice. Harvard University Press.
David Hume (1739/2000). A Treatise of Human Nature. Oxford University Press.
John Rawls (2009/2005). A Theory of Justice. In Steven M. Cahn (ed.), Philosophy and Rhetoric. Oxford University Press 133-135.
Citations of this work BETA
No citations found.
Similar books and articles
Daniel M. Weinstock (ed.) (2007). Global Justice, Global Institutions. University of Calgary Press.
Cindy Holder (2012). Justice, Cosmopolitanism and Policy Prescription: Gillian Brock’s "Global Justice". Diametros 31 (31):138-145.
Alex Voorhoeve (2005). Incentives and Principles for Individuals in Rawls’ Theory of Justice. Ethics and Economics 3 (1):1-7.
Charles R. Beitz (2005). Cosmopolitanism and Global Justice. Journal of Ethics 9 (1-2):11 - 27.
Simon Caney (2006). Cosmopolitan Justice and Institutional Design. Social Theory and Practice 32 (4):725-756.
B. Ladwig (2013). Global Justice, Cosmopolitanism and Moral Path Dependency. Philosophy and Social Criticism 39 (1):3-20.
Laura Valentini (2011). Coercion and Justice. American Political Science Review 105 (1):205-220.
Bruce Landesman (2012). Brock’s Cosmopolitanism: Sensible but Incomplete. Diametros 31 (31):146-156.
Win-Chiat Lee (2012). Cosmopolitanism with Room for Nationalism. Journal of Moral Philosophy 9 (2):279-293.
Aaron Maltais (2008). Global Warming and the Cosmopolitan Political Conception of Justice. Environmental Politics 17 (4):592-609.
Arash Abizadeh (2007). Cooperation, Pervasive Impact, and Coercion: On the Scope of Distributive Justice. Philosophy and Public Affairs 35 (4):318–358.
Kok-Chor Tan (2002). Liberal Nationalism and Cosmopolitan Justice. Ethical Theory and Moral Practice 5 (4):431-461.
Added to index2012-02-20
Total downloads28 ( #121,548 of 1,777,873 )
Recent downloads (6 months)5 ( #123,860 of 1,777,873 )
How can I increase my downloads?