Topoi 27 (1-2):87-99 (2008)
|Abstract||Lewis’s view of the way conventions are passed on may have some especially interesting consequences for the study of language. I’ll start by briefly discussing agreements and disagreements that I have with Lewis’s general views on conventions and then turn to how linguistic conventions spread. I’ll compare views of main stream generative linguistics, in particular, Chomsky’s views on how syntactic forms are passed on, with the sort of view of language acquisition and language change advocated by usage-based or construction grammars, which seem to fit better with Lewis’s ideas. Then I will illustrate the interest of Lewis’s perspective on the dissemination of conventions with a variety of linguistic examples|
|Keywords||David Lewis Conventions Construction grammar Utterance-based grammar Universal grammar Linguistic rules|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
|Through your library||Configure|
Similar books and articles
David Braddon-Mitchell, Kristie Miller & Braddon-Mitchell (2004). How to Be a Conventional Person. The Monist 87 (4):457 - 474.
Margaret Gilbert (1983). Agreements, Conventions, and Language. Synthese 54 (3):375 - 407.
Martin Bunzl & Richard Kreuter (2003). Conventions Made Too Simple? Philosophy of the Social Sciences 33 (4):417-426.
Nicholas Southwood & Lina Eriksson (2011). Norms and Conventions. Philosophical Explorations 14 (2):195 - 217.
Margaret Gilbert (1981). Game Theory Andconvention. Synthese 46 (1):41 - 93.
Adele Mercier (2003). Are Language Conventions Philosophically Explanatory? Croatian Journal of Philosophy 3 (2):111-124.
Francis Y. Lin (1999). Chomsky on the 'Ordinary Language' View of Language. Synthese 120 (2):151-191.
Ruth Garrett Millikan (1998). Language Conventions Made Simple. Journal of Philosophy 95 (4):161-180.
Added to index2009-01-28
Total downloads69 ( #15,377 of 722,742 )
Recent downloads (6 months)1 ( #60,247 of 722,742 )
How can I increase my downloads?