|Abstract||Lewis’s view of the way conventions are passed on may have some especially interesting consequences for the study of language. I’ll start by briefly discussing agreements and disagreements that I have with Lewis’s general views on conventions and then turn to how linguistic conventions spread. I’ll compare views of main stream generative linguistics, in particular, Chomsky’s views on how syntactic forms are passed on, with the sort of view of language acquisition and language change advocated by usage-based or construction grammars, which seem to fit better with Lewis’s ideas. Then I will illustrate the interest of Lewis’s perspective on the dissemination of conventions with a variety of linguistic examples.|
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Through your library||Configure|
Similar books and articles
David Braddon-Mitchell, Kristie Miller & Braddon-Mitchell (2004). How to Be a Conventional Person. The Monist 87 (4):457-474.
Francis Y. Lin (1999). Chomsky on the 'Ordinary Language' View of Language. Synthese 120 (2):151-191.
Adele Mercier (2003). Are Language Conventions Philosophically Explanatory? Croatian Journal of Philosophy 3 (2):111-124.
Margaret Gilbert (1981). Game Theory Andconvention. Synthese 46 (1):41 - 93.
Nicholas Southwood & Lina Eriksson (2011). Norms and Conventions. Philosophical Explorations 14 (2):195 - 217.
Martin Bunzl & Richard Kreuter (2003). Conventions Made Too Simple? Philosophy of the Social Sciences 33 (4):417-426.
Margaret Gilbert (1983). Agreements, Conventions, and Language. Synthese 54 (3):375 - 407.
Ruth Garrett Millikan (1998). Language Conventions Made Simple. Journal of Philosophy 95 (4):161-180.
Added to index2009-01-28
Total downloads66 ( #13,590 of 548,984 )
Recent downloads (6 months)2 ( #37,320 of 548,984 )
How can I increase my downloads?