Behavioral and Brain Sciences 24 (5):894-895 (2001)
|Abstract||The target article can be strengthened by supplementing it with a better theory of mental representation. Given such a theory, there is reason to suppose that, first, even the most primitive representations are mostly of distal affairs; second, the most primitive representations also turn out to be directed two ways at once, both stating facts and directing action.|
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
|Through your library||Configure|
Similar books and articles
Peter C. R. Lane, Peter C.-H. Cheng & Fernand Gobet (2001). The CHREST Model of Active Perception and its Role in Problem Solving. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 24 (5):892-893.
Rick Grush (1997). The Architecture of Representation. Philosophical Psychology 10 (1):5-23.
Gregg H. Rosenberg & Michael L. Anderson, Content and Action: The Guidance Theory of Representation.
Michael L. Anderson (2005). Representation, Evolution and Embodiment. Theoria et Historia Scientarum.
Gerard A. W. Vreeswijk (2005). Direct Connectionistic Methods for Scientific Theory Formation. Poznan Studies in the Philosophy of the Sciences and the Humanities 84 (1):375-403.
Mark Siebel (2004). Does TEC Explain the Emergence of Distal Representations? Behavioral and Brain Sciences 27 (4):588-589.
Robert W. Proctor & Kim-Phuong L. Vu (2001). TEC: Integrated View of Perception and Action or Framework for Response Selection? Behavioral and Brain Sciences 24 (5):899-900.
Daniel C. Richardson & Michael J. Spivey (2001). The TEC as a Theory of Embodied Cognition. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 24 (5):900-901.
Added to index2009-01-28
Total downloads13 ( #95,467 of 722,731 )
Recent downloads (6 months)1 ( #60,247 of 722,731 )
How can I increase my downloads?