David Bourget (Western Ontario)
David Chalmers (ANU, NYU)
Rafael De Clercq
Jack Alan Reynolds
Learn more about PhilPapers
Synthese 113 (2):171-193 (1997)
The article argues for the possibility of translation manuals having an implicit internal structure. This structure is composed of specific methodological assumptions and techniques. Using the (N)-type and (G)-type distinction developed by Fuller for the study of scientific behavior, it is shown that these are incomplete characterizations of translation manuals. A more complete characterization must involve an analysis of how the presence or absence of methodological rules influences the interpretation of specific research questions. It is further argued that while Quine's original indeterminacy thesis cannot be completely rejected, in some cases it can be modified to reflect the importance of the methodological constraints. Finally, it is suggested that the more critical analysis of translation manuals will benefit the on-going debates in the study of scientific behavior.
|Keywords||Philosophy Philosophy Epistemology Logic Metaphysics Philosophy of Language|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
|Through your library|
References found in this work BETA
No references found.
Citations of this work BETA
No citations found.
Similar books and articles
Donald Hockney (1975). The Bifurcation of Scientific Theories and Indeterminacy of Translation. Philosophy of Science 42 (4):411-427.
Anna Lydia Motto (1970). Guide to the Thought of Lucius Annaeus Seneca. Amsterdam,A. M. Hakkert.
Steven I. Miller & Marcel Fredericks (1991). Some Notes on the Nature of Methodological Indeterminacy. Synthese 88 (3):359 - 378.
A. F. J. van Raan (ed.) (1988). Handbook of Quantitative Studies of Science and Technology. Sole Distributors for the U.S.A. And Canada, Elsevier Science Pub. Co..
Howard Burdick (1989). On Davidson and Interpretation. Synthese 80 (3):321 - 345.
David K. Henderson (1987). The Principle of Charity and the Problem of Irrationality (Translation and the Problem of Irrationality). Synthese 73 (2):225 - 252.
Christopher R. Hitchcock (1992). Discussion. Journal of Philosophical Research 17:215-223.
Steven I. Miller (1999). The Rationalitätstreit Revisited: A Note on Roth's "Methodological Pluralism". Philosophy of the Social Sciences 29 (3):339-353.
Peter J. Galie & Christopher Bopst (2006). Machiavelli & Modern Business: Realist Thought in Contemporary Corporate Leadership Manuals. [REVIEW] Journal of Business Ethics 65 (3):235 - 250.
Added to index2009-01-28
Total downloads7 ( #274,000 of 1,700,378 )
Recent downloads (6 months)2 ( #269,935 of 1,700,378 )
How can I increase my downloads?