Binocular rivalry and the cerebral hemispheres, with a note on the correlates and constitution of visual consciousness
David Bourget (Western Ontario)
David Chalmers (ANU, NYU)
Rafael De Clercq
Jack Alan Reynolds
Learn more about PhilPapers
Brain and Mind 2 (1):119-49 (2001)
In addressing thescientific study of consciousness, Crick and Koch state, It is probable that at any moment some active neuronal processes in your head correlate with consciousness, while others do not: what is the difference between them? (1998, p. 97). Evidence from electrophysiological and brain-imaging studies of binocular rivalry supports the premise of this statement and answers to some extent, the question posed. I discuss these recent developments and outline the rationale and experimental evidence for the interhemispheric switch hypothesis of perceptual rivalry. According to this model, the perceptual alternations of rivalry reflect hemispheric alternations, suggesting that visual consciousness of rivalling stimuli may be unihemispheric at any one time (Miller et al., 2000). However, in this paper, I suggest that interhemispheric switching could involve alternating unihemispheric attentional selection of neuronal processes for access to visual consciousness. On this view, visual consciousness during rivalry could be bi hemispheric because the processes constitutive of attentional selection may be distinct from those constitutive of visual consciousness. This is a special case of the important distinction between the neuronal correlates and constitution of visual consciousness.
|Keywords||attentional selection bipolar disorder binocular rivalry caloric vestibular stimulation coherence rivalry consciousness interhemispheric switching neural correlates transcranial magnetic stimulation|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
|Through your library||Configure|
References found in this work BETA
No references found.
Citations of this work BETA
No citations found.
Similar books and articles
Randolph Blake & Chai-Youn Kim (2005). Psychophysical Strategies for Rendering the Normally Visible Invisible. Trends in Cognitive Sciences 9 (8):381-388.
K. Moutoussis, G. A. Keliris, Z. Kourtzi & N. K. Logothetis (2005). A Binocular Rivalry Study of Motion Perception in the Human Brain. Vision Research 45 (17):2231-43.
Sam M. Doesburg, Keiichi Kitajo & Lawrence M. Ward (2005). Increased Gamma-Band Synchrony Precedes Switching of Conscious Perceptual Objects in Binocular Rivalry. Neuroreport 16 (11):1139-1142.
R. R. Blake (2001). A Primer on Binocular Rivalry, Including Current Controversies. Brain and Mind 2 (1):5-38.
Andreas K. Engel, P. Fries, P. Kreiter Konig, M. Brecht & Wolf Singer (1999). Temporal Binding, Binocular Rivalry, and Consciousness. Consciousness and Cognition 8 (2):128-51.
E. D. Lumer (2000). Binocular Rivalry and Human Visual Awareness. In Thomas Metzinger (ed.), Neural Correlates of Consciousness. MIT Press.
Ramesh Srinivasan & Sanja Petrovic (2006). Meg Phase Follows Conscious Perception During Binocular Rivalry Induced by Visual Stream Segregation. Cerebral Cortex 16 (5):597-608.
Robert P. O'Shea & Paul M. Corballis (2001). Binocular Rivalry Between Complex Stimuli in Split-Brain Observers. Brain and Mind 2 (1):151-160.
Frank Tong (2001). Competing Theories of Binocular Rivalry: A Possible Resolution. [REVIEW] Brain and Mind 2 (1):55-83.
John D. Pettigrew (2001). Searching for the Switch: Neural Bases for Perceptual Rivalry Alternations. [REVIEW] Brain and Mind 2 (1):85-118.
Added to index2009-01-28
Total downloads15 ( #90,364 of 1,088,905 )
Recent downloads (6 months)1 ( #69,735 of 1,088,905 )
How can I increase my downloads?