David Bourget (Western Ontario)
David Chalmers (ANU, NYU)
Rafael De Clercq
Ezio Di Nucci
Jack Alan Reynolds
Learn more about PhilPapers
University of Chicago Press (1996)
Did the Gulf War defend moral principle or Western oil interests? Is violent pornography an act of free speech or an act of violence against women? In Casuistry and Modern Ethics , Richard B. Miller sheds new light on the potential of casuistry--case-based reasoning--for resolving these and other questions of conscience raised by the practical quandaries of modern life. Rejecting the packaging of moral experience within simple descriptions and inflexible principles, Miller argues instead for identifying and making sense of the ethically salient features of individual cases. Because this practical approach must cope with a diverse array of experiences, Miller draws on a wide variety of diagnostic tools from such fields as philosophy of science, legal reasoning, theology, literary theory, hermeneutics, and moral philosophy. Opening new avenues for practical reasoning, Miller's interdisciplinary work will challenge scholars who are interested in the intersections of ethics and political philosophy, cultural criticism, and debates about method in religion and morality.
|Keywords||Casuistry Ethical problems Practical reason Ethics, Modern|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
|Buy the book||$18.45 used (78% off) $86.97 new (1% off) $87.00 direct from Amazon Amazon page|
|Call number||BJ1441.M55 1996|
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
|Through your library|
References found in this work BETA
No references found.
Citations of this work BETA
B. Hurwitz (2012). Textual Practices in Crafting Bioethics Cases. Journal of Bioethical Inquiry 9 (4):395-401.
Richard B. Miller (2009). Killing, Self-Defense, and Bad Luck. Journal of Religious Ethics 37 (1):131-158.
William S. Lynn (1998). Contested Moralities: Animals and Moral Value in the Dear/Symanski Debate. Philosophy and Geography 1 (2):223 – 242.
William S. Lynn (1998). Contested Moralities: Animals and Moral Value in the Dear/Symanski Debate. Ethics, Place and Environment 1 (2):223-242.
Similar books and articles
David E. Boeyink (1992). Casuistry: A Case-Based Methods for Journalists. Journal of Mass Media Ethics 7 (2):107 – 120.
Alex John London (2000). Amenable to Reason: Aristotle's Rhetoric and the Moral Psychology of Practical Ethics. Kennedy Institute of Ethics Journal 10 (4):287-305.
Albert R. Jonsen (1986). Casuistry and Clinical Ethics. Theoretical Medicine and Bioethics 7 (1).
Richard B. Miller (2000). Humanitarian Intervention, Altruism, and the Limits of Casuistry. Journal of Religious Ethics 28 (1):3 - 35.
Robert Audi (1989). Practical Reasoning. Routledge.
Albert R. Jonsen (1991). Casuistry as Methodology in Clinical Ethics. Theoretical Medicine and Bioethics 12 (4).
Martin Calkins (2001). Casuistry and the Business Case Method. Business Ethics Quarterly 11 (2):237-259.
John Berkman (2001). Richard. Miller, Casuistry and Modern Ethics: A Poetics of Practical Reasoning:Casuistry and Modern Ethics: A Poetics of Practical Reasoning. Ethics 112 (1):169-172.
Sandra L. Borden (1999). Character as a Safeguard for Journalists Using Case-Based Ethical Reasoning. International Journal of Applied Philosophy 13 (1):93-104.
Added to index2009-01-28
Total downloads16 ( #229,060 of 1,907,681 )
Recent downloads (6 months)1 ( #463,516 of 1,907,681 )
How can I increase my downloads?