Journal of Business Ethics 59 (1-2):163 - 174 (2005)
|Abstract||This paper posits that differences in corporate governance structure partly result from differences in institutional arrangements linked to business systems. We developed a new international triad of business systems: the Anglo-American, the Communitarian and the Emerging system, building on the frameworks of Choi et al. (British Academy of Management (Kynoch Birmingham) 1996, Management International Review 39, 257–279, 1999). A common factor determining the success of a corporate governance structure is the extent to which it is transparent to market forces. Such transparency is more than pure financial transparency; as it can also be based on factors such as governmental, banking and other types of institutional transparency mechanism. There may also be a choice for firms to adopt voluntary corporate disclosure in situations where mandatory disclosure is not established. The Asian financial crisis of 1997–1999 and the more recent corporate governance scandals such as Enron, Andersen and Worldcom in the United States and Ahold and Parmalat in Europe show that corporate governance and business ethics issues exist throughout the world. As an illustration we focus on Asia’s emerging1 markets, as, both in view of the pressure of globalization and taking into account the institutional arrangements peculiar to the emerging business system, these issues are important there. Particularly for those who have to find an accommodation between the corporate governance structures and disclosure standards of the Emerging system and those of the Anglo-American and Communitarian systems.|
|Keywords||Asia’s emerging markets institutional transparency corporate governance international business systems|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
|Through your library||Configure|
Similar books and articles
G. J. Rossouw, A. van der Watt & D. P. Malan Rossouw (2002). Corporate Governance in South Africa. Journal of Business Ethics 37 (3):289 - 302.
Tessa Hebb (2006). The Economic Inefficiency of Secrecy: Pension Fund Investors' Corporate Transparency Concerns. [REVIEW] Journal of Business Ethics 63 (4):385 - 405.
Flávio M. Rabelo & Flávio C. Vasconcelos (2002). Corporate Governance in Brazil. Journal of Business Ethics 37 (3):321 - 335.
Bryan W. Husted & Carlos Serrano (2002). Corporate Governance in Mexico. Journal of Business Ethics 37 (3):337 - 348.
Silke Machold & Ajit Kumar Vasudevan (2004). Corporate Governance Models in Emerging Markets: The Case of India. International Journal of Business Governance and Ethics 1 (1):56-77.
Javed Siddiqui (2010). Development of Corporate Governance Regulations: The Case of an Emerging Economy. [REVIEW] Journal of Business Ethics 91 (2):253 - 274.
Viet Ha Hoang (2006). Securities Market and Corporate Governance of Privatised Firms. International Journal of Business Governance and Ethics 2 (s 3-4):254-279.
Stephen Yan-Leung Cheung, J. Thomas Connelly & Piman Limpaphayom (unknown). Determinants of Corporate Disclosure and Transparency: Evidence From Hong Kong and Thailand. :313-342.
Jennifer Bremer & Nabil Elias (2007). Corporate Governance in Developing Economies the Case of Egypt. International Journal of Business Governance and Ethics 3 (4):430-445.
Stephen Yan-Leung Cheung, J. Thomas Connelly & Piman Limpaphayom (2007). Determinants of Corporate Disclosure and Transparency. International Corporate Responsibility Series 3:313-342.
Added to index2009-01-28
Total downloads21 ( #65,329 of 722,813 )
Recent downloads (6 months)1 ( #60,541 of 722,813 )
How can I increase my downloads?