David Bourget (Western Ontario)
David Chalmers (ANU, NYU)
Rafael De Clercq
Jack Alan Reynolds
Learn more about PhilPapers
Journal of Business Ethics 87 (4):455 - 462 (2009)
Despite the importance of the co-evolution approach in various branches of research, such as strategy, organisation theory, complexity, population ecology, technology and innovation (Lewin et al., 1999; March, 1991), co-evolution has been relatively neglected in international business and ethics research (Madhok and Phene, 2001). The purpose of this article is to show how co-evolution theory provides a theoretical framework within which some issues of ethics research are addressed. Our analysis is in the context of the contrasts between business systems (North, 1990), and in particular the distinction between informal systems and those systems where institutions are formalised in law. This complements the growing research on comparative corporate governance and capitalisms (Chandler and Hikino, 1990; Choi et al., 1999; Whitley, 1994). The synthesis of co-evolution and analysis of divergent institutional environments in ethics research can also complement the globalisation and MNE approaches to international business research.
|Keywords||ethics co-evolution law informality business systems institutions|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
|Through your library||Configure|
References found in this work BETA
M. Arce (2004). Conspicuous By Its Absence: Ethics and Managerial Economics. [REVIEW] Journal of Business Ethics 54 (3):261-277.
Saras D. Sarasvathy (2002). Entrepreneurship As Economics With Imagination. The Ruffin Series of the Society for Business Ethics 2002:95-112.
Citations of this work BETA
Brandt Dainow (2013). What Can a Medieval Friar Teach Us About the Internet? Deriving Criteria of Justice for Cyberlaw From Thomist Natural Law Theory. Philosophy and Technology 26 (4):459-476.
Similar books and articles
Eugenijus Gefenas (2007). Balancing Ethical Principles in Emergency Medicine Research. Science and Engineering Ethics 13 (3):281-288.
Emmanuelle Lévesque, Yann Joly & Jacques Simard (2011). Return of Research Results: General Principles and International Perspectives. Journal of Law, Medicine and Ethics 39 (4):583-592.
Aurora Plomer (2005). The Law and Ethics of Medical Research: International Bioethics and Human Rights. Cavendish.
Carla Cjm Millar, Tarek I. EldomIaty, Chong Ju Choi & Brian Hilton (2005). Corporate Governance and Institutional Transparency in Emerging Markets. Journal of Business Ethics 59 (1-2):163 - 174.
Sev S. Fluss (2004). The Evolution of Research Ethics: The Current International Configuration. Journal of Law, Medicine and Ethics 32 (4):596-603.
Chong Ju Choi, Sae Won Kim & Jai Beom Kim (2010). Globalizing Business Ethics Research and the Ethical Need to Include the Bottom-of-the-Pyramid Countries: Redefining the Global Triad as Business Systems and Institutions. [REVIEW] Journal of Business Ethics 94 (2):299 - 307.
Michael McDonald (1992). The Canadian Research Strategy for Applied Ethics: A New Opportunity for Research in Business and Professional Ethics. [REVIEW] Journal of Business Ethics 11 (8):569 - 583.
Giulia Calabretta, Boris Durisin & Marco Ogliengo (2011). Uncovering the Intellectual Structure of Research in Business Ethics: A Journey Through the History, the Classics, and the Pillars of Journal of Business Ethics. [REVIEW] Journal of Business Ethics 104 (4):499-524.
Cory Searcy (2012). Corporate Sustainability Performance Measurement Systems: A Review and Research Agenda. [REVIEW] Journal of Business Ethics 107 (3):239-253.
Kam C. Chan, Hung-Gay Fung & Jot Yau (2010). Business Ethics Research: A Global Perspective. [REVIEW] Journal of Business Ethics 95 (1):39 - 53.
Added to index2009-01-28
Total downloads6 ( #162,690 of 1,088,370 )
Recent downloads (6 months)1 ( #69,449 of 1,088,370 )
How can I increase my downloads?