De laguna's interpretation of G. H. Mead
Journal of Philosophy 44 (6):158-162 (1947)
| Abstract | This article has no associated abstract. (fix it) | |||||||||
| Keywords | No keywords specified (fix it) | |||||||||
| Categories | ||||||||||
| Options |
|
|||||||||
Download options| PhilPapers Archive |
Upload a copy of this paper Check publisher's policy on self-archival Papers currently archived: 5,679 |
| External links |
 |
| Through your library | Configure |
Similar books and articlesGert J. J. Biesta (1998). Mead, Intersubjectivity, and Education: The Early Writings. Studies in Philosophy and Education 17 (2/3):73-99.
Theodore De Laguna (1909). The Interpretation of the Apology. Philosophical Review 18 (1):23 - 37.
Theodore De Laguna (1922). The Interpretation of Heraclitus. Philosophical Review 31 (6):598 - 601.
Theodore de Laguna (1922). The Interpretation of Heraclitus. Philosophical Review 31 (6):598-601.
Theodore De Laguna (1909). The Interpretation of the Apology. Philosophical Review 18 (1):23-37.
S. L. Greenslade (1964). Jose S. Lasso de la Vega: Héroe Griego y Santo Cristiano. Pp. 88. La Laguna: Universidad de la Laguna, 1962. Paper. The Classical Review 14 (01):115-.
Grace A. De Laguna (1946). Communication, The Act, and the Object with Reference to Mead. Journal of Philosophy 43 (9):225 - 238.
Grace A. de Laguna (1946). Communication, the Act, and the Object with Reference to Mead. Journal of Philosophy 43 (9):225-238.
Analytics
Monthly downloads
Sorry, there are not enough data points to plot this chart.
|
Added to index2009-01-28Total downloads2 ( #232,501 of 549,087 )Recent downloads (6 months)0How can I increase my downloads? |
My notes
Discussion
