David Bourget (Western Ontario)
David Chalmers (ANU, NYU)
Rafael De Clercq
Jack Alan Reynolds
Learn more about PhilPapers
Journal of Bioethical Inquiry 5 (4):265-270 (2008)
This commentary examines the ethics and law in the United States as they relate to the foregoing of life sustaining treatment when such treatment is deemed medically inappropriate. In particular the article highlights the procedural approach when there is disagreement between physicians and surrogates or patients as exemplified in Texas Law. This approach, although worthy in concept, may in practice invite opposition and dissatisfaction as it may be perceived as coercive and pitting the weak against powerful adversaries and interests, in addition to discouraging the exercise of professional virtues. Too inflexible an approach erodes trust, and furthermore the Texas law allows hospital ethics committees to move from an advisory non judgmental role to a quasi legal court with real legal power but no credentialing or oversight.
|Keywords||Health law Futility Ethics committees|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
|Through your library|
References found in this work BETA
Mary Ellen Wojtasiewicz (2006). Damage Compounded: Disparities, Distrust, and Disparate Impact in End-of-Life Conflict Resolution Policies. American Journal of Bioethics 6 (5):8 – 12.
Robert D. Truog & Christine Mitchell (2006). Futility - From Hospital Policies to State Laws. American Journal of Bioethics 6 (5):19 – 21.
E. D. Pellegrino (2005). Futility in Medical Decisions. HEC Forum 17 (4):308-318.
M. Wreen (2007). Medical Futility and Physician Discretion. The Proceedings of the Twenty-First World Congress of Philosophy 1 (3):257-267.
E. Haavi Morreim (1994). Profoundly Diminished Life: The Casualties of Coercion. Hastings Center Report 24 (1):33-42.
Citations of this work BETA
No citations found.
Similar books and articles
Edward P. Richards & Katharine C. Rathbun (1982). A Procrustean Approach to Informed Consent: The Texas Medical Disclosure Panel. Journal of Law, Medicine & Ethics 10 (5):158-164.
Colleen Gallagher & Ryan Holmes (2012). Handling Cases of 'Medical Futility'. HEC Forum 24 (2):91-98.
I. I. Smith, Utility and the Principle of Medical Futility: Safeguarding Autonomy and the Prohibition Against Cruel and Unusual Punishment.
Glenn G. Griener (1995). The Physician's Authority to Withhold Futile Treatment. Journal of Medicine and Philosophy 20 (2):207-224.
M. D. David M. Zientek (2005). The Texas Advance Directives Act of 1999: An Exercise in Futility? HEC Forum 17 (4):245-259.
Mark J. Cherry & H. Tristram Engelhardt (2004). Informed Consent in Texas: Theory and Practice. Journal of Medicine and Philosophy 29 (2):237 – 252.
Eugene V. Boisaubin (2004). Observations of Physician, Patient and Family Perceptions of Informed Consent in Houston, Texas. Journal of Medicine and Philosophy 29 (2):225 – 236.
Elizabeth Heitman & Virginia Gremillion (2001). Ethics Committees Under Texas Law: Effects of the Texas Advance Directives Act. [REVIEW] HEC Forum 13 (1):82-104.
Cameron Stewart (2011). Futility Determination as a Process: Problems with Medical Sovereignty, Legal Issues and the Strengths and Weakness of the Procedural Approach. [REVIEW] Journal of Bioethical Inquiry 8 (2):155-163.
Added to index2009-01-28
Total downloads17 ( #157,110 of 1,725,580 )
Recent downloads (6 months)6 ( #110,437 of 1,725,580 )
How can I increase my downloads?