Ethical Theory and Moral Practice 11 (5):551 - 561 (2008)
|Abstract||The purpose of this paper is to consider Joshua Gert’s novel view of subjective practical rationality in his book Brute Rationality. After briefly outlining the account, I present two objections to his view and then consider his own objections to a rival approach to understanding subjective rationality which I take to be much more plausible.|
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Through your library||Configure|
Similar books and articles
Andrew Reisner (2009). Unifying the Requirements of Rationality. Philosophical Explorations 12 (3):243-260.
Joshua Gert (2005). A Functional Role Analysis of Reasons. Philosophical Studies 124 (3):353 - 378.
Joshua Gert (2000). Practical Rationality, Morality, and Purely Justificatory Reasons. American Philosophical Quarterly 37 (3):227 - 243.
Sigrún Svavarsdóttir (2008). The Virtue of Practical Rationality. Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 77 (1):1-33.
Sergio Tenenbaum (2007). Brute Requirements. Canadian Journal of Philosophy 37 (1):153-173.
Terence Cuneo (2006). Joshua Gert, Brute Rationality:Brute Rationality. Ethics 116 (4):785-789.
Joshua Gert (2008). Putting Particularism in its Place. Pacific Philosophical Quarterly 89 (3):312-324.
Jonathan Way (2009). Two Accounts of the Normativity of Rationality. Journal of Ethics and Social Philosophy.
Joshua Gert (2004). Brute Rationality: Normativity and Human Action. Cambridge University Press.
Christian Miller (2005). Review of Joshua Gert, Brute Rationality: Normativity and Human Action. [REVIEW] Notre Dame Philosophical Reviews 2005 (3).
Added to index2009-01-28
Total downloads21 ( #58,806 of 551,007 )
Recent downloads (6 months)0
How can I increase my downloads?