Graduate studies at Western
Philosophy of Science 56 (June):288-302 (1989)
|Abstract||I defend the historical definition of "function" originally given in my Language, Thought and Other Biological Categories (1984a). The definition was not offered in the spirit of conceptual analysis but is more akin to a theoretical definition of "function". A major theme is that nonhistorical analyses of "function" fail to deal adequately with items that are not capable of performing their functions|
|Keywords||Definition Function History Language|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
|Through your library||Configure|
Similar books and articles
Janina Kotarbinska (1960). On Ostensive Definitions. Philosophy of Science 27 (1):1-22.
Michael Bertrand (2013). Proper Environment and the SEP Account of Biological Function. Synthese 190 (9):1503-1517.
D. M. Walsh (1996). Fitness and Function. British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 47 (4):553-574.
Somogy Varga (2011). Defining Mental Disorder. Exploring the 'Natural Function' Approach. Philosophy, Ethics, and Humanities in Medicine 6 (1):1-.
Robert Arp (2007). Evolution and Two Popular Proposals for the Definition of Function. Journal for General Philosophy of Science 38 (1):19 - 30.
Kenneth G. Ferguson (2007). Biological Function and Normativity. Philo 10 (1):17-26.
Karen Neander (1991). Functions as Selected Effects: The Conceptual Analyst's Defense. Philosophy of Science 58 (2):168-184.
Added to index2009-01-28
Total downloads206 ( #1,604 of 754,495 )
Recent downloads (6 months)10 ( #10,791 of 754,495 )
How can I increase my downloads?