Is homeopathy really 'morally and ethically unacceptable'? A critique of pure scientism

Bioethics 26 (9):501-503 (2012)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

In this short response we show that Kevin Smith's moral and ethical rejections of homeopathy1 are fallacious and rest on questionable epistemology. Further, we suggest Smith's presumption of a utilitarian stance is an example of scientism encroaching into medicine

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,202

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Analytics

Added to PP
2012-04-18

Downloads
181 (#104,260)

6 months
6 (#431,022)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Kate Chatfield
University of Central Lancashire

Citations of this work

Scientism and Pseudoscience: A Philosophical Commentary.Massimo Pigliucci - 2015 - Journal of Bioethical Inquiry 12 (4):569-575.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references