David Bourget (Western Ontario)
David Chalmers (ANU, NYU)
Rafael De Clercq
Jack Alan Reynolds
Learn more about PhilPapers
Oxford: Clarendon Press (2005)
Ruth Millikan is well known for having developed a strikingly original way for philosophers to seek understanding of mind and language, which she sees as biological phenomena. She now draws together a series of groundbreaking essays which set out her approach to language. Guiding the work of most linguists and philosophers of language today is the assumption that language is governed by prescriptive normative rules. Millikan offers a fundamentally different way of viewing the partial regularities that language displays, comparing them to biological norms that emerge from natural selection. This yields novel and quite radical consequences for our understanding of the nature of public linguistic meaning, the process of language understanding, how children learn language, and the semantics/pragmatics distinction.
|Keywords||Biology Form Language Linguistics Norm Science|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
|Buy the book||$67.00 new (53% off) $88.68 used (39% off) $145.00 direct from Amazon Amazon page|
|Call number||P107.M55 2005|
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
|Through your library|
References found in this work BETA
No references found.
Citations of this work BETA
Nicholas Shea (2007). Consumers Need Information: Supplementing Teleosemantics with an Input Condition. Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 75 (2):404-435.
Ruth Garrett Millikan (2012). Are There Mental Indexicals and Demonstratives? Philosophical Perspectives 26 (1):217-234.
Richard Moore (2013). Imitation and Conventional Communication. Biology and Philosophy 28 (3):481-500.
Savas L. Tsohatzidis (2012). How to Forget That 'Know' is Factive. Acta Analytica 27 (4):449-459.
Ruth G. Millikan (2007). An Input Condition for Teleosemantics? Reply to Shea (and Godfrey-Smith). Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 75 (2):436-455.
Similar books and articles
Prof A. V. Kravchenko (2002). Cognitive Linguistics as a Methodological Paradigm. In [Book Chapter].
Michael Devitt (2006). Ignorance of Language. Oxford: Clarendon Press.
Ruth G. Millikan (2003). In Defense of Public Language. In Louise M. Antony & H. Hornstein (eds.), Chomsky and His Critics. Blackwell
Gloria Origgi & Dan Sperber (2000). Evolution, Communication and the Proper Function of Language. In Peter Carruthers & A. Chamberlain (eds.), [Book Chapter] (in Press). Cambridge University Press 140--169.
Robert D. Rupert (1999). Mental Representations and Millikan's Theory of Intentional Content: Does Biology Chase Causality? Southern Journal of Philosophy 37 (1):113-140.
William Cameron (2008). Ruth Garrett Millikan, Language: A Biological Model. [REVIEW] Minds and Machines 18 (1):127-131.
John Collins (2007). Language: A Biological Model – Ruth Garrett Millikan. Philosophical Quarterly 57 (226):142–145.
Added to index2009-01-28
Total downloads78 ( #43,354 of 1,726,249 )
Recent downloads (6 months)3 ( #231,316 of 1,726,249 )
How can I increase my downloads?