Methodologies, not method, for primate theory of mind
Behavioral and Brain Sciences 21 (1):126-127 (1998)
| Abstract | Heyes correctly points out some problems in primate theory of mind, but lacks a critical approach to children's theory of mind, and at times implies meta-awareness when discussing theory of mind. Also, in selecting pure experimental designs, she ignores its limitations, as well as the merits, and at times the necessity, of other methodologies. | |||||||||
| Keywords | No keywords specified (fix it) | |||||||||
| Categories | No categories specified (fix it) | |||||||||
| Options |
|
|||||||||
Download options| PhilPapers Archive |
Upload a copy of this paper Check publisher's policy on self-archival Papers currently archived: 5,653 |
| External links |
 |
| Through your library | Configure |
Similar books and articlesIvan Leudar & Alan Costall (2009). Theory of Mind : The Madness Behind the Method. In Ivan Leudar & Alan Costall (eds.), Against Theory of Mind. Palgrave Macmillan.
Jesse E. Purdy & Michael Domjan (1998). Tactics in Theory of Mind Research. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 21 (1):129-130.
C. M. Heyes (1998). Theory of Mind in Nonhuman Primates. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 21 (1):101-114.
Matt McCormick (2003). Questions About Functionalism in Kant's Philosophy of Mind: Lessons for Cognitive Science. Journal of Experimental & Theoretical Artificial Intelligence 15 (2):255-266.
Stephen J. Wykstra (1980). Toward a Historical Meta-Method for Assessing Normative Methodologies: Rationability, Serendipity, and the Robinson Crusoe Fallacy. PSA: Proceedings of the Biennial Meeting of the Philosophy of Science Association 1980:211 - 222.
Colin Gray & Phil Russell (1998). Theory of Mind in Nonhuman Primates: A Question of Language? Behavioral and Brain Sciences 21 (1):121-121.
Deepthi Kamawar & David R. Olson (1998). Theory of Mind in Young Human Primates: Does Heyes's Task Measure It? Behavioral and Brain Sciences 21 (1):122-123.
Robert W. Mitchell & James R. Anderson (1998). Primate Theory of Mind is a Turing Test. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 21 (1):127-128.
A. Parker (1998). Primate Cognitive Neuroscience: What Are the Useful Questions? Behavioral and Brain Sciences 21 (1):128-128.
Steven M. Green, David L. Wilson & Siân Evans (1998). Anecdotes, Omniscience, and Associative Learning in Examining the Theory of Mind. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 21 (1):122-122.
Analytics
Monthly downloads |
Added to index2009-01-28Total downloads4 ( #178,473 of 548,984 )Recent downloads (6 months)1 ( #63,327 of 548,984 )How can I increase my downloads? |
My notes
Discussion
