In Bernard Elevitch (ed.), Philosophy of Mind, Proceedings of the Twentieth World Congress of Philosophy. Philosopy Documentation Center (2000)
|Abstract||Brentano was surely mistaken, however, in thinking that bearing a relation to something nonexistent marks only the mental. Given any sort of purpose, it might not get fulfilled, hence might exhibit Brentano's relation, and there are many natural purposes, such as the purpose of one's stomach to digest food or the purpose of one's protective eye blink reflex to keep out the sand, that are not mental, nor derived from anything mental. Nor are stomachs and reflexes "of" or"about" anything. A reply might be, I suppose, that natural purposes are "purposes" only in an analogical sense hence "fail to be fulfilled" only in an analogical way. They bear an analogy to things that have been intentionally designed by purposive minds, hence can fail to accomplish the purposes they analogically have. As such they also have only analogical "intentionality". Such a response begs the question, however, for it assumes that natural purposes are not purposes in the full sense exactly because they are not|
|Keywords||Intentionality Natural Brentano|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
|Through your library||Configure|
Similar books and articles
Peter Andras Varga (2008). BRENTANO'S INFLUENCE ON HUSSERL'S EARLY NOTION OF INTENTIONALITY. Studia Universitatis Babes-Bolyai - Philosophia (1-2):29-48.
Dermot Moran (2000). Heidegger's Critique of Husserl's and Brentano's Accounts of Intentionality. Inquiry 43 (1):39 – 65.
Philip J. Bartok (2005). Brentano's Intentionality Thesis: Beyond the Analytic and Phenomenological Readings. Journal of the History of Philosophy 43 (4):437-460.
George Bealer (1996). Materialism and the Logical Structure of Intentionality. In Objections to Physicalism. New York: Clarendon Press.
Kenneth A. Taylor (2007). Sign, Sign, Everywhere a Sign! [REVIEW] Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 75 (3):703–709.
Tim Crane (1998). Intentionality as the Mark of the Mental. In Tim Crane (ed.), Contemporary Issues in the Philosophy of Mind. Cambridge University Press.
Linda L. McAlister (ed.) (1977). The Philosophy of Brentano. Humanities Press.
Anders Nes (2008). Are Only Mental Phenomena Intentional? Analysis 68 (299):205–215.
Stephen F. Barker (1982). Intensionality and Intentionality. Philosophy Research Archives 8:95-109.
Added to index2009-01-28
Total downloads148 ( #3,473 of 722,708 )
Recent downloads (6 months)5 ( #17,032 of 722,708 )
How can I increase my downloads?