Notes on teaching logic
David Bourget (Western Ontario)
David Chalmers (ANU, NYU)
Rafael De Clercq
Jack Alan Reynolds
Learn more about PhilPapers
hese notes don’t reach any conclusions. Their purpose is to point to issues one needs to think through seriously when thinking about logic teaching. They indicate some of the relevant literature where some of these issues are addressed, but they also raise points that seem to have been overlooked. They aim to promote informed discussion. That indeed was their origin: they are descended from an internal discussion document prepared a few years ago when the then Department of Philosophy at the University of Edinburgh was reviewing its logic teaching.
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
No categories specified
(categorize this paper)
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
|Through your library||
References found in this work BETA
No references found.
Citations of this work BETA
No citations found.
Similar books and articles
Krister Segerberg (1989). Notes on Conditional Logic. Studia Logica 48 (2):157 - 168.
Despina A. Stylianou, Maria L. Blanton & Eric J. Knuth (eds.) (2009). Teaching and Learning Proof Across the Grades: A K-16 Perspective. Routledge.
Don S. Levi (1998). Teaching Logic. Teaching Philosophy 21 (3):237-256.
Nancy Slonneger Hancock (2006). Logic for the LSAT. Teaching Philosophy 29 (2):125-155.
Marvin J. Croy (2010). Teaching the Practical Relevance of Propositional Logic. Teaching Philosophy 33 (3):253-270.
Shawn Hedman (2004). A First Course in Logic: An Introduction to Model Theory, Proof Theory, Computability, and Complexity. Oxford University Press.
Sam Butchart, Toby Handfield & Greg Restall (2009). Teaching Philosophy, Logic and Critical Thinking Using Peer Instruction. Teaching Philosophy (1):1-40.
Francis Watanabe Dauer (1989). Critical Thinking: An Introduction to Reasoning. Oxford University Press.
Lloyd Humberstone (2005). For Want of an 'And': A Puzzle About Non-Conservative Extension. History and Philosophy of Logic 26 (3):229-266.
Mark C. Baetz & David J. Sharp (2004). Integrating Ethics Content Into the Core Business Curriculum: Do Core Teaching Materials Do the Job? [REVIEW] Journal of Business Ethics 51 (1):53-62.
Added to index2009-01-28
Total downloads6 ( #202,005 of 1,098,978 )
Recent downloads (6 months)0
How can I increase my downloads?