David Bourget (Western Ontario)
David Chalmers (ANU, NYU)
Rafael De Clercq
Ezio Di Nucci
Jack Alan Reynolds
Learn more about PhilPapers
Religious Studies 1 (2):141 - 150 (1966)
Various attempts have been made in recent years to present Christianity in such a way that no use is made of the traditional dichotomy between the ‘natural’ and the ‘supernatural’. Braithwaite, Hare, and van Buren, for instance, appear to have no use for the dichotomy; and I think that, without too much distortion, one can say the same of Bultmann, Tillich, and Robinson. I am not, however, concerned in this paper with the work of any one thinker as such, but rather with a general climate of opinion. What I want to do is to examine the grounds on which it might be argued that belief in the supernatural is discredited. The issue seems to me of special importance at the present time, since, if these grounds are inadequate, programmes of reform under the general heading ‘Christianity without the supernatural’lose much of their point; if, on the other hand, the grounds are compelling, then reform of some kind is forced upon us whatever the accompanying difficulties
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
|Through your library|
References found in this work BETA
No references found.
Citations of this work BETA
No citations found.
Similar books and articles
Charles Stinson (1973). The Finite Supernatural: Theological Perspectives. Religious Studies 9 (3):325 - 337.
Brian R. Cornwell, Aron K. Barbey & W. Kyle Simmons (2004). The Embodied Bases of Supernatural Concepts. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 27 (6):735-736.
Steve Clarke (2009). Naturalism, Science and the Supernatural. Sophia 48 (2):127-142.
Steve Clarke (2007). The Supernatural and the Miraculous. Sophia 46 (3):277 - 285.
Nathalia L. Gjersoe & Bruce M. Hood (2006). The Supernatural Guilt Trip Does Not Take Us Far Enough. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 29 (5):473-474.
George Santayana (1932). The Genteel Tradition at Bay. Haskell House.
Eulalio R. Baltazar (1966). Teilhard and the Supernatural. Baltimore, Helicon.
John Oman (1931). The Natural & the Supernatural. Freeport, N.Y.,Books for Libraries Press.
Margaret A. Boden (1969). Miracles and Scientific Explanation. Ratio 11:137 - 144.
Andrew Aberdein (2003). Balderdash and Chicanery: Science and Beyond. In James South (ed.), Buffy the Vampire Slayer and Philosophy: Fear and Trembling in Sunnydale. Open Court 79-90.
L. V. Lester-Garland (1934). The Idea of the Supernatural. New York, the Macmillan Co..
Morgan Luck (2007). Supernatural Miracles and Religious Inclusiveness. Sophia 46 (3):287 - 293.
Jesse M. Bering & Todd K. Shackelford (2004). Supernatural Agents May Have Provided Adaptive Social Information. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 27 (6):732-733.
John Hadley (2005). Excluding Destruction. Philosophy in the Contemporary World 12 (2):22-29.
Kenneth D. Eberhard (1971). Karl Rahner and the Supernatural Existential. Thought: A Journal of Philosophy 46 (4):537-561.
Added to index2011-05-29
Total downloads3 ( #617,357 of 1,902,050 )
Recent downloads (6 months)1 ( #466,345 of 1,902,050 )
How can I increase my downloads?