Graduate studies at Western
Utilitas 16 (1):96-108 (2004)
|Abstract||In a recent article in Ethics, Elijah Millgram presents a novel reconstruction of J. S. Mill's ‘proof’ of the principle of utility. Millgram's larger purpose is to critique instrumentalist approaches to practical reasoning. His reading of the proof makes Mill out to be an instrumentalist, and Millgram thinks that the ultimate failure of Mill's argument usefully illustrates an inconsistency inherent in instrumentalism. Yet Millgram's interpretation of the proof does not succeed. Mill is not an instrumentalist. Millgram may be right that instrumentalism is incoherent, but he has chosen the wrong figure to illustrate the point.|
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
|Through your library||Configure|
Similar books and articles
Elijah Millgram (1996). Williams' Argument Against External Reasons. Noûs 30 (2):197-220.
Elijah Millgram (1995). Was Hume a Humean? Hume Studies 21 (1):75-94.
Elijah Millgram (2002). Candace Vogler, John Stuart Mill's Deliberative Landscape:John Stuart Mill's Deliberative Landscape. Ethics 112 (4):880-883.
Ben Eggleston, Dale E. Miller & D. Weinstein (eds.) (2011). John Stuart Mill and the Art of Life. Oxford University Press.
Elijah Millgram (2009). Liberty, the Higher Pleasures, and Mill's Missing Science of Ethnic Jokes. Social Philosophy and Policy 26 (1):326-353.
Elijah Millgram (1997). Practical Induction. Harvard University Press.
Elijah Millgram (2009). John Stuart Mill, Determinism, and the Problem of Induction. Australasian Journal of Philosophy 87 (2):183-199.
Elijah Millgram (2010). Mill's Incubus. In Ben Eggleston, Dale E. Miller & D. Weinstein (eds.), John Stuart Mill and the Art of Life. Oxford University Press.
Elijah Millgram (2000). Mill's Proof of the Principle of Utility. Ethics 110 (2):282-310.
Added to index2009-01-28
Total downloads11 ( #107,531 of 739,163 )
Recent downloads (6 months)0
How can I increase my downloads?