On Reading Signs; Some Differences between Us and The Others
David Bourget (Western Ontario)
David Chalmers (ANU, NYU)
Rafael De Clercq
Ezio Di Nucci
Jonathan Jenkins Ichikawa
Jack Alan Reynolds
Learn more about PhilPapers
On Reading Signs; Some Differences between Us and The Others If there are certain kinds of signs that an animal cannot learn to interpret, that might be for any of a number of reasons. It might be, first, because the animal cannot discriminate the signs from one another. For example, although human babies learn to discriminate human speech sounds according to the phonological structures of their native languages very easily, it may be that few if any other animals are capable of fully grasping the phonological structures of human languages. If an animal cannot learn to interpret certain signs it might be, second, because the decoding is too difficult for it. It could be, for example, that some animals are incapable of decoding signs that exhibit syntactic embedding, or signs that are spread out over time as opposed to over space. Problems of these various kinds might be solved by using another sign system, say, gestures rather than noises, or visual icons laid out in spatial order, or by separating out embedded propositions and presenting each separately. But a more interesting reason that an animal might be incapable of understanding a sign would be that it lacked mental representations of the necessary kind. It might be incapable of representing mentally what the sign conveys. When discussing what signs animals can understand or..
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
No categories specified
(categorize this paper)
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
|Through your library||
References found in this work BETA
No references found.
Citations of this work BETA
Pamela Lyon (2007). From Quorum to Cooperation: Lessons From Bacterial Sociality for Evolutionary Theory. Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part C 38 (4):820-833.
Pamela Lyon (2007). From Quorum to Cooperation: Lessons From Bacterial Sociality for Evolutionary Theory. Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part C: Studies in History and Philosophy of Biological and Biomedical Sciences 38 (4):820-833.
G. McWhirter (2016). Behavioural Deception and Formal Models of Communication. British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 67 (3):757-780.
Similar books and articles
Winfried Nöth (2003). Semiotic Foundations of the Study of Pictures. Sign Systems Studies 31 (2):377-391.
Kenneth A. Taylor (2007). Sign, Sign, Everywhere a Sign! [REVIEW] Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 75 (3):703–709.
Charles W. Morris (1972). Writings on the General Theory of Signs. The Hague,Mouton.
James H. Fetzer (1997). Thinking and Computing: Computers as Special Kinds of Signs. [REVIEW] Minds and Machines 7 (3):345-364.
Charles Morris (1948). Signs About Signs About Signs. Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 9 (1):115-133.
Olivia Custer (2012). Angling for a Stranglehold on the Death Penalty. Southern Journal of Philosophy 50 (s1):160-173.
Aleksei Turovski (2002). On the Zoosemiotics of Health and Disease. Sign Systems Studies 30 (1):213-218.
Albert Atkin (2008). Peirce's Final Account of Signs and the Philosophy of Language. Transactions of the Charles S. Peirce Society 44 (1):pp. 63-85.
Risto Hilpinen (2007). On the Objects and Interpretants of Signs: Comments on T. L. Short's Peirce's Theory of Signs. Transactions of the Charles S. Peirce Society 43 (4):610 - 618.
John Deely (2004). From Semiotics to Semioethics. Semiotics 36 (2):242-261.
John Nessa (1996). About Signs and Symptoms: Can Semiotics Expand the View of Clinical Medicine? Theoretical Medicine and Bioethics 17 (4).
Added to index2010-12-22
Total downloads77 ( #61,559 of 1,940,956 )
Recent downloads (6 months)1 ( #457,978 of 1,940,956 )
How can I increase my downloads?