David Bourget (Western Ontario)
David Chalmers (ANU, NYU)
Rafael De Clercq
Jack Alan Reynolds
Learn more about PhilPapers
Journal of Medicine and Philosophy 14 (6):617-640 (1989)
The procurement of fetal tissue for transplantation may promise great benefit to those suffering from various pathologies, e.g., neural disorders, diabetes, renal problems, and radiation sickness. However, debates about the use of fetal tissue have proceeded without much attention to ethical theory and application. Two broad moral questions are addressed here, the first formal, the second substantive: Is there a framework from other moral paradigms to assist in ethical debates about the transplantation of fetal tissue? Does the use of fetal tissue entail cooperation in abortion? To answer these questions I develop a theoretical framework by combining the paradigm of just-war reasoning with canons governing the use of cadaverous tissue. The kinds of safeguards provided by this paradigm allow fetal tissue to be procured without the taint of association with abortion. Central to solving the problem of cooperation is the distinction between intending and foreseeing a moral misdeed. Fetal researchers may foresee fetal death in elective abortions without intending such deaths to occur. Thus, even those who object unequivocally to elective abortion may condone the procurement of fetal tissue, if sufficient reason exists. Keywords: fetal tissue, casuistry, prima facie duties, just-war tenets, complicity CiteULike Connotea Del.icio.us What's this?
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
|Through your library|
References found in this work BETA
No references found.
Citations of this work BETA
No citations found.
Similar books and articles
Lynn Gillam (1997). Arguing by Analogy in the Fetal Tissue Debate. Bioethics 11 (5):397-412.
G. de Wert, R. L. P. Berghmans, G. J. Boer, S. Andersen, B. Brambati, A. S. Carvalho, K. Dierickx, S. Elliston, P. Nunez, W. Osswald & M. Vicari (2002). Ethical Guidance on Human Embryonic and Fetal Tissue Transplantation: A European Overview. Medicine, Health Care and Philosophy 5 (1):79-90.
R. Jo Kornegay (2011). Hursthouse's Virtue Ethics and Abortion: Abortion Ethics Without Metaphysics? [REVIEW] Ethical Theory and Moral Practice 14 (1):51-71.
R. Curson (1991). Human IVF, Embryo Research, Fetal Tissue for Research and Treatment, and Abortion: International Information. Journal of Medical Ethics 17 (2):105-106.
S. Woods & K. Taylor (2008). Ethical and Governance Challenges in Human Fetal Tissue Research. Clinical Ethics 3 (1):14-19.
C. Strong (1991). Fetal Tissue Transplantation: Can It Be Morally Insulated From Abortion? Journal of Medical Ethics 17 (2):70-76.
Gabriel Palmer-Fernandez & James E. Reagan (1998). Human Fetal Tissue Transplantation Research and Elective Abortion. Journal of Social Philosophy 29 (1):5-19.
G. J. Boer (1999). Ethical Issues in Neurografting of Human Embryonic Cells. Theoretical Medicine and Bioethics 20 (5):461-475.
H. Tristram Engelhardt Jr (1989). The Use of Fetal and Anencephalic Tissue for Transplantation. Journal of Medicine and Philosophy 14 (1):25-43.
Lynn Gillam (1998). The 'More-Abortions' Objection to Fetal Tissue Transplantation. Journal of Medicine and Philosophy 23 (4):411 – 427.
Added to index2010-08-19
Total downloads10 ( #230,378 of 1,725,935 )
Recent downloads (6 months)1 ( #349,693 of 1,725,935 )
How can I increase my downloads?