David Bourget (Western Ontario)
David Chalmers (ANU, NYU)
Rafael De Clercq
Ezio Di Nucci
Jonathan Jenkins Ichikawa
Jack Alan Reynolds
Learn more about PhilPapers
Behavioral and Brain Sciences 28 (2):290-291 (2005)
Across mammals, when fathers matter, as they did for hunter-gatherers, sex-similar pair-bonding mechanisms evolve. Attachment fertility theory can explain Schmitt's and other findings as resulting from a system of mechanisms affording pair-bonding in which promiscuous seeking is part. Departures from hunter-gatherer environments (e.g., early menarche, delayed marriage) can alter dating trajectories, thereby impacting mating outside of pair-bonds.
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
|Through your library|
References found in this work BETA
No references found.
Citations of this work BETA
No citations found.
Similar books and articles
Ian Vine (2000). “What's Love Got to Do with It?” Self-Awareness and Human Mating Strategies. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 23 (4):622-623.
Kosuke Itoh & Akihiro Izumi (2005). Affiliative Bonding as a Dynamical Process: A View From Ethology. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 28 (3):355-356.
Robert A. Wilson (2010). The Primal Path to Kinship: A Critical Review of Bernard Chapais, Primeval Kinship: How Pair-Bonding Gave Birth to Human Society. Biology and Philosophy 25 (1):111-123.
Warren B. Miller (2005). Affiliative Reward and the Ontogenetic Bonding System. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 28 (3):357-358.
Steven W. Gangestad & Jeffry A. Simpson (2000). Trade-Offs, the Allocation of Reproductive Effort, and the Evolutionary Psychology of Human Mating. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 23 (4):624-636.
C. S. Carter, K. L. Bales & S. W. Porges (2005). Neuropeptides Influence Expression of and Capacity to Form Social Bonds. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 28 (3):353-354.
David M. Buss (2005). Sex Differences in the Design Features of Socially Contingent Mating Adaptations. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 28 (2):278-279.
Vivian Zayas & Daphna Ram (2009). What Love has to Do with It: An Attachment Perspective on Pair Bonding and Sexual Behavior. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 32 (1):44-45.
Lynn Carol Miller, William C. Pedersen, Allison R. Johnson & Anila D. Putcha (2000). For the Short-Term: Are Women Just Looking for a Few Pair of Genes? Behavioral and Brain Sciences 23 (4):614-615.
Added to index2009-01-28
Total downloads33 ( #130,973 of 1,938,809 )
Recent downloads (6 months)10 ( #55,633 of 1,938,809 )
How can I increase my downloads?