Philosophy of Science 76 (5) (2009)
|Abstract||Newton’s argument for universal gravitation in the Principia eventually rested on the third “Rule of Philosophizing,” which warrants the generalization of “qualities of bodies.” An analysis of the rule and the history of its development indicate that the term ‘quality’ should be taken to include both inherent properties of bodies and relations among systems of bodies, generalized into `laws'. By incorporating law‐induction into the rule, Newton could legitimately rebuff objections to his theory by claiming that universal gravitation was justified by his method even if he could not specify the cause of gravity . †To contact the author, please write to: Department of Philosophy, Duke University, 201 West Duke Building, Box 90743, Durham, NC 27708; e‐mail: firstname.lastname@example.org.|
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Through your library||Configure|
Similar books and articles
Athanassios Raftopoulos (1999). Newton's Experimental Proofs as Eliminative Reasoning. Erkenntnis 50 (1):91-121.
Alex Rosenberg & Karen Neander (2009). Are Homologies (Selected Effect or Causal Role) Function Free? Philosophy of Science 76 (3):307-334.
David Marshall Miller (2012). Galileo's Impractical Science. Metascience 21 (1):223-225.
Steffen Ducheyne (2006). The Argument(s) for Universal Gravitation. Foundations of Science 11 (4).
B. E. (2003). The Newtonian Myth. Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part A 34 (4):763-780.
Andrew Janiak & Eric Schliesser (eds.) (2012). Interpreting Newton: Critical Essays. Cambridge University Press.
Quayshawn Spencer (2004). Do Newton's Rules of Reasoning Guarantee Truth ... Must They? Studies in History and Philosophy of Science 35 (4):759-782.
Scott Tanona (2000). The Anticipation of Necessity: Kant on Kepler's Laws and Universal Gravitation. Philosophy of Science 67 (3):421-443.
Added to index2010-02-17
Total downloads33 ( #37,235 of 556,909 )
Recent downloads (6 months)1 ( #64,931 of 556,909 )
How can I increase my downloads?