Reply: A bet with Peacocke
In C. Macdonald (ed.), Philosophy of Psychology: Debates on Psychological Explanation. Cambridge: Blackwell (1995)
| Abstract | This article has no associated abstract. (fix it) | |||||||||
| Keywords | Biology Psychology Semantics Peacocke, C | |||||||||
| Categories | ||||||||||
| Options |
|
|||||||||
Download options| PhilPapers Archive |
Upload a copy of this paper Check publisher's policy on self-archival Papers currently archived: 5,705 |
| External links | This entry has no external links. Add one. |
| Through your library | Configure |
Similar books and articlesTyler Burge (2003). Concepts, Conceptions, Reflective Understanding: Reply to Peacocke. In Martin Hahn & B. Ramberg (eds.), Reflections and Replies: Essays on the Philosophy of Tyler Burge. Mit Press.
Neil Tennant (2002). The Emperor's New Concepts. Noûs 36 (16):345-377.
Christopher Peacocke (1991). Demonstrative Content: A Reply to John McDowell. Mind 100 (1):123-133.
Scott Soames (1986). Comments on Peacocke's Explanation in Computational Psychology. Mind and Language 1:372-387.
Stephen R. Schiffer (1986). Comments on Peacocke's Explanation in Computational Psychology. Mind and Language 1:362-371.
James T. Higginbotham (1986). Comments on Peacocke's Explanation in Computational Psychology. Mind and Language 1:358-361.
Glyn W. Humphreys & Philip T. Quinlan (1986). Comments on Peacocke's Explanation in Computational Psychology. Mind and Language 1:355-357.
L. (2003). The Non-Circularity Constraint: Peacocke Vs. Peacocke. Teorema 22 (1-2):85-93.
Alan Millar (1994). Possessing Concepts: Christopher Peacocke's a Study of Concepts. Mind 103 (409):73-82.
Analytics
Monthly downloads
Sorry, there are not enough data points to plot this chart.
|
Added to index2009-01-28Total downloads0Recent downloads (6 months)0How can I increase my downloads? |
My notes
Discussion
