David Bourget (Western Ontario)
David Chalmers (ANU, NYU)
Rafael De Clercq
Jack Alan Reynolds
Learn more about PhilPapers
Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part A 39 (2):186-193 (2008)
Between 1896 and 1898 Russell’s philosophy was considerably influenced by Hermann Lotze. Lotze’s influence on Russell was especially pronounced in introducing metaphysical—anthropological, in particular—assumptions in Russell’s logic and ontology. Three steps in his work reflect this influence. (i) The first such step can be discerned in the Principle of Differentiation, which Russell accepted in the Essay (finished in October 1986); according to this Principle, the objects of human cognition are segmented complexes which have diverse parts (individuals). (ii) After Russell reread Lotze in June 1897, he claimed that the solution of the dilemma of pluralism or monism depends on how we see space and time: as relational or as adjectival? (iii) Russell decided for the relational conception only after he attended lectures by McTaggart on Lotze in January to February 1898. The lectures helped Russell to advance (from April to June 1898) a new theory of judgment according to which judgments relate terms (individuals) which are distinct one from another. Space and time moreover are series of moments and places with external relations between themselves. The discussions Russell had with Moore in May to June 1898 took place only after Russell developed this conception; they did not cause his philosophical turn.
|Keywords||Keywords: Anthropology Judgement G. E. Moore R. H. Lotze B. Russell Space Time|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
|Through your library|
References found in this work BETA
Christopher Adair-Toteff (1994). The Neo-Kantian Raum Controversy. British Journal for the History of Philosophy 2 (2):131 – 148.
Thomas Baldwin (1991). The Identity Theory of Truth. Mind 100 (1):35-52.
David Bell (1999). The Revolution of Moore and Russell: A Very British Coup? Royal Institute of Philosophy Supplement 44:193-209.
Gottfried Gabriel (1984). Fregean Connection: Bedeutung, Value and Truth-Value. Philosophical Quarterly 34 (136):372-376.
Kai Hauser (2003). Lotze and Husserl. Archiv für Geschichte der Philosophie 85 (2):152-178.
Citations of this work BETA
No citations found.
Similar books and articles
Richard F. Kitchener (2004). Bertrand Russell's Flirtation with Behaviorism. Behavior and Philosophy 32 (2):273 - 291.
Francisco Rodríguez Consuegra (1987). Russell's Logicist Definitions of Numbers, 1898–1913: Chronology and Significance. History and Philosophy of Logic 8 (2):141-169.
Jaime Nubiola (1994). Russell, Crexells, and d'Ors: Barcelona, 1920. Russell: The Journal of the Betrand Russell Archives 14 (2):155-161.
Howard Wettstein (1990). Frege‐Russell Semantics? Dialectica 44 (1‐2):113-135.
Bertrand Russell (2003). Russell on Metaphysics: Selections From the Writings of Bertrand Russell. Routledge.
T. Allan Hillman (2008). The Early Russell on the Metaphysics of Substance in Leibniz and Bradley. Synthese 163 (2):245 - 261.
Bertrand Russell (ed.) (1973). Bertrand Russell, the Social Scientist. Bertrand Russell Supranational Society.
James Levine (2001). On Russell's Vulnerability to Russell's Paradox. History and Philosophy of Logic 22 (4):207-231.
Nikolay Milkov (2001). The History or Russell's Concepts 'Sense-Data' and 'Knowledge by Acquaintance'. Archiv Fuer Begriffsgeschichte 43:221-231.
Added to index2009-01-28
Total downloads38 ( #53,053 of 1,410,427 )
Recent downloads (6 months)1 ( #177,872 of 1,410,427 )
How can I increase my downloads?