Respect for animal autonomy in bioethical analysis: The case of automatic milking systems (AMS) [Book Review]
David Bourget (Western Ontario)
David Chalmers (ANU, NYU)
Rafael De Clercq
Ezio Di Nucci
Jack Alan Reynolds
Learn more about PhilPapers
Journal of Agricultural and Environmental Ethics 12 (1):41-50 (2000)
An analysis of the ethical impacts of the use of anAutomatic Milking System (AMS) is employed as a casestudy to illustrate the use of a form of bioethicalanalysis in technology assessment. The approach isbased on the Ethical Matrix, where `impacts' areassessed in terms of (lack of) respect for threeethical principles as applied to interest groups. Inthis case, only impacts on dairy cows are examined,and principally in terms of their behaviouralfreedom.In contrast to traditional milking systems, AMS, inprinciple, allow cows to present for milkingvoluntarily. So with AMS, it is claimed that dairymanagement relies on the autonomous interaction of thecow with her environment.
|Keywords||Automatic milking systems dairy technology assessment bioethics animal behaviour|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
|Through your library|
References found in this work BETA
No references found.
Citations of this work BETA
Lewis Holloway, Christopher Bear & Katy Wilkinson (2014). Robotic Milking Technologies and Renegotiating Situated Ethical Relationships on UK Dairy Farms. Agriculture and Human Values 31 (2):185-199.
Clemens Driessen & Leonie F. M. Heutinck (2015). Cows Desiring to Be Milked? Milking Robots and the Co-Evolution of Ethics and Technology on Dutch Dairy Farms. Agriculture and Human Values 32 (1):3-20.
Similar books and articles
John Collier (2002). What is Autonomy? Philosophical Explorations.
Pedro Gallo (2004). Integrating Ethical Enquiry and Health Technology Assessment: Limits and Opportunities for Efficiency and Equity. Poiesis and Praxis 2 (s 2-3):103-117.
Edgar Andrade-Lotero & Catarina Dutilh Novaes (2012). Validity, the Squeezing Argument and Alternative Semantic Systems: The Case of Aristotelian Syllogistic. [REVIEW] Journal of Philosophical Logic 41 (2):387-418.
M. Therese Lysaught (2004). Respect: Or, How Respect for Persons Became Respect for Autonomy. Journal of Medicine and Philosophy 29 (6):665 – 680.
Iain Law (2011). Respect for Autonomy: Its Demands and Limits in Biobanking. [REVIEW] Health Care Analysis 19 (3):259-268.
O. C. Ferrell (1999). An Assessment of the Proposed Academy of Marketing Science Code of Ethics for Marketing Educators. Journal of Business Ethics 19 (2):225 - 228.
Hilary Putnam (1995). Review of Shadows of the Mind. [REVIEW] AMS Bulletin 32 (3).
Jennifer Kuzma & John C. Besley (2008). Ethics of Risk Analysis and Regulatory Review: From Bio- to Nanotechnology. [REVIEW] NanoEthics 2 (2):149-162.
Frank W. Oudshoorn, Reint Jan Renes & Imke J. M. De Boer (2008). Systems in Organic Dairy Production. Journal of Agricultural and Environmental Ethics 21 (3):205-228.
James Wilson (2007). Is Respect for Autonomy Defensible? Journal of Medical Ethics 33 (6):353-356.
Added to index2009-01-28
Total downloads20 ( #185,374 of 1,796,239 )
Recent downloads (6 months)5 ( #170,249 of 1,796,239 )
How can I increase my downloads?