Rule-following, response-dependence, and McDowell's debate with anti-realism
In European Review of Philosophy, Volume 3: Response-Dependence. Stanford: CSLI Publications (1998)
| Abstract | This article has no associated abstract. (fix it) | |||||||||
| Keywords | Antirealism Meaning Mcdowell, J | |||||||||
| Categories | ||||||||||
| Options |
|
|||||||||
Download options| PhilPapers Archive |
Upload a copy of this paper Check publisher's policy on self-archival Papers currently archived: 5,705 |
| External links | This entry has no external links. Add one. |
| Through your library | Configure |
Similar books and articlesMichael Kremer (2000). Wilson on Kripke's Wittgenstein. Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 60 (3):571-584.
Anil Gomes (2011). McDowell's Disjunctivism and Other Minds. Inquiry 54 (3):277-292.
Alexander Miller (2004). Rule-Following and Externalism. Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 68 (1):127-140.
Adam M. Croom (2010). Thick Concepts, Non-Cognitivism, and Wittgenstein's Rule Following Considerations. South African Journal of Philosophy 29 (3):286-309.
Adrian Haddock (2008). McDowell and Idealism. Inquiry 51 (1):79 – 96.
John Henry McDowell (1998). Meaning, Knowledge, and Reality. Harvard University Press.
David Bain (2009). McDowell and the Presentation of Pains. Philosophical Topics 37 (1):1-24.
Dan López de Sa (2006). Values Vs Secondary Qualities. Teorema 25:197-210.
Analytics
Monthly downloads
Sorry, there are not enough data points to plot this chart.
|
Added to index2009-01-28Total downloads0Recent downloads (6 months)0How can I increase my downloads? |
My notes
Discussion
