International Corporate Responsibility Series 3:101-128 (2007)
|Abstract||This paper reviews the experience of an integrated approach to CSR in the U.S. electric utility sector. The authors report on the results of Southern Company’s historical definition of CSR as a dynamic model, balancing stakeholder needs through shifting pressures to assure long-term shareholder value, superior customer, price performance, and sustainable economic development. Using financial and utility sector measures, the paper assesses the company’s “balancing” approach to addressing CSR, which weights corporate, environmental, community, and economic factors in driving successful and sustained financial, social, and environmental performance. The paper concludes by suggesting that CSR success in this sector requires, first, that the global warming issue be governed by the same balancing considerations to which all stakeholders and their legitimate interests are subject, and second, an energy policy that embraces both atechnology policy and appropriate regulatory incentives|
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Categories||No categories specified (fix it)|
|Through your library||Configure|
Similar books and articles
Christopher S. Miller & Silvia M. King (unknown). Southern Company: A Case Study in Corporate Responsibility Leadership. :101-128.
C. B. Bhattacharya, Daniel Korschun & Sankar Sen (2009). Strengthening Stakeholder–Company Relationships Through Mutually Beneficial Corporate Social Responsibility Initiatives. Journal of Business Ethics 85:257 - 272.
Marc Vilanova, Josep Maria Lozano & Daniel Arenas (2009). Exploring the Nature of the Relationship Between CSR and Competitiveness. Journal of Business Ethics 87:57 - 69.
Smolens & Nicolaas Tempelhof (2005). Cultural Perspectives of CSR Opportunities for German Firms in Poland. International Corporate Responsibility Series 2:259-283.
Hae-Ryong Kim, Moonkyu Lee, Hyoung-Tark Lee & Na-Min Kim (forthcoming). Corporate Social Responsibility and Employee–Company Identification. Journal of Business Ethics.
Morgan P. Miles & Jeffrey G. Covin (2000). Environmental Marketing: A Source of Reputational, Competitive, and Financial Advantage. Journal of Business Ethics 23 (3):299 - 311.
Yu-Chiang Hu & Chia-Ching Fatima Wang (2009). Collectivism, Corporate Social Responsibility, and Resource Advantages in Retailing. Journal of Business Ethics 86 (1):1 - 13.
M. Gunawan Alif & Retno Artsanti (2009). Nutrition for Kids Was Good for the Company. International Corporate Responsibility Series 4:349-366.
Yingyan Wang (2009). Examination on Philosophy-Based Management of Contemporary Japanese Corporations: Philosophy, Value Orientation and Performance. Journal of Business Ethics 85 (1):1 - 12.
Thomas Laudal (forthcoming). An Attempt to Determine the Csr Potential of the International Clothing Business. Journal of Business Ethics.
Lucio Lamberti & Giuliano Noci (2012). The Relationship Between CSR and Corporate Strategy in Medium-Sized Companies: Evidence From Italy. Business Ethics 21 (4):402-416.
Geoffrey See (2009). Harmonious Society and Chinese Csr: Is There Really a Link? Journal of Business Ethics 89 (1):1 - 22.
Guido Berens, Cees B. M. van Riel & Johan van Rekom (2007). The CSR-Quality Trade-Off: When Can Corporate Social Responsibility and Corporate Ability Compensate Each Other? Journal of Business Ethics 74 (3):233 - 252.
Onyeka Osuji (2011). Fluidity of Regulation-CSR Nexus: The Multinational Corporate Corruption Example. Journal of Business Ethics 103 (1):31-57.
Lisa Whitehouse (2006). Corporate Social Responsibility: Views From the Frontline. Journal of Business Ethics 63 (3):279 - 296.
Sorry, there are not enough data points to plot this chart.
Added to index2011-12-02
Recent downloads (6 months)0
How can I increase my downloads?