David Bourget (Western Ontario)
David Chalmers (ANU, NYU)
Rafael De Clercq
Ezio Di Nucci
Jack Alan Reynolds
Learn more about PhilPapers
International Corporate Responsibility Series 3:101-128 (2007)
This paper reviews the experience of an integrated approach to CSR in the U.S. electric utility sector. The authors report on the results of Southern Company’s historical definition of CSR as a dynamic model, balancing stakeholder needs through shifting pressures to assure long-term shareholder value, superior customer, price performance, and sustainable economic development. Using financial and utility sector measures, the paper assesses the company’s “balancing” approach to addressing CSR, which weights corporate, environmental, community, and economic factors in driving successful and sustained financial, social, and environmental performance. The paper concludes by suggesting that CSR success in this sector requires, first, that the global warming issue be governed by the same balancing considerations to which all stakeholders and their legitimate interests are subject, and second, an energy policy that embraces both atechnology policy and appropriate regulatory incentives
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
|Through your library|
References found in this work BETA
No references found.
Citations of this work BETA
No citations found.
Similar books and articles
Christa Thomsen & Jakob Lauring (2008). Practicing the Business of Corporate Social Responsibility: A Process Perspective. International Journal of Business Governance and Ethics 4 (2):117.
Marjo Elisa Siltaoja (2006). Value Priorities as Combining Core Factors Between CSR and Reputation – a Qualitative Study. Journal of Business Ethics 68 (1):91 - 111.
Philipp Schreck (2011). Reviewing the Business Case for Corporate Social Responsibility: New Evidence and Analysis. [REVIEW] Journal of Business Ethics 103 (2):167-188.
Guido Berens, Cees B. M. van Riel & Johan van Rekom (2007). The CSR-Quality Trade-Off: When Can Corporate Social Responsibility and Corporate Ability Compensate Each Other? [REVIEW] Journal of Business Ethics 74 (3):233 - 252.
Yu-Chiang Hu & Chia-Ching Fatima Wang (2009). Collectivism, Corporate Social Responsibility, and Resource Advantages in Retailing. Journal of Business Ethics 86 (1):1 - 13.
Roy W. Smolens Jr & Nicolaas Tempelhof (2005). Cultural Perspectives of CSR Opportunities for German Firms in Poland. International Corporate Responsibility Series 2:259-283.
Hae-Ryong Kim, Moonkyu Lee, Hyoung-Tark Lee & Na-Min Kim (2010). Corporate Social Responsibility and Employee—Company Identification. Journal of Business Ethics 95 (4):557 - 569.
C. B. Bhattacharya, Daniel Korschun & Sankar Sen (2009). Strengthening Stakeholder–Company Relationships Through Mutually Beneficial Corporate Social Responsibility Initiatives. Journal of Business Ethics 85 (2):257 - 272.
M. Gunawan Alif & Retno Artsanti (2009). Nutrition for Kids Was Good for the Company. International Corporate Responsibility Series 4:349-366.
Christopher S. Miller & Silvia M. King (2007). Southern Company. International Corporate Responsibility Series 3:101-128.
Sorry, there are not enough data points to plot this chart.
Added to index2009-01-28
Recent downloads (6 months)0
How can I increase my downloads?