Software informed consent: Docete emptorem, not caveat emptor [Book Review]

Science and Engineering Ethics 4 (3):357-362 (1998)
Abstract
Should software be sold “as is”, totally guaranteed, or something else? This paper suggests that “informed consent”, used extensively in medical ethics, is an appropriate way to envision the buyer/developer relationship when software is sold. We review why the technical difficulties preclude delivering perfect software, but allow statistical predictions about reliability. Then we borrow principles refined by medical ethics and apply them to computer professionals.
Keywords software engineering ethics  software informed consent  computer ethics
Categories (categorize this paper)
Options
 Save to my reading list
Follow the author(s)
My bibliography
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Revision history Request removal from index
 
Download options
PhilPapers Archive


Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy on self-archival     Papers currently archived: 10,322
External links
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
Through your library
References found in this work BETA

No references found.

Citations of this work BETA
Keith W. Miller (2008). Critiquing a Critique. Science and Engineering Ethics 14 (2):245-249.
Similar books and articles
Analytics

Monthly downloads

Added to index

2009-01-28

Total downloads

9 ( #149,773 of 1,096,519 )

Recent downloads (6 months)

1 ( #246,097 of 1,096,519 )

How can I increase my downloads?

My notes
Sign in to use this feature


Discussion
Start a new thread
Order:
There  are no threads in this forum
Nothing in this forum yet.