David Bourget (Western Ontario)
David Chalmers (ANU, NYU)
Rafael De Clercq
Ezio Di Nucci
Jack Alan Reynolds
Learn more about PhilPapers
In Susan L. Hurley & Matthew Nudds (eds.), Rational Animals? Oxford University Press (2006)
By whatever general principles and mechanisms animal behavior is governed, human behavior control rides piggyback on top of the same or very similar mechanisms. We have reflexes. We can be conditioned. The movements that make up our smaller actions are mostly caught up in perception-action cycles following perceived Gibsonian affordances. Still, without doubt there are levels of behavior control that are peculiar to humans. Following Aristotle, tradition has it that what is added in humans is rationality ("rational soul"). Rationality, however, can be and has been characterized in many different ways. I am going to speculate about two different kinds of cognitive capacities that we humans seem to have, each of which is at least akin to rationality as Aristotle described it. The first I believe we share with many other animals, the second perhaps with none. Since this session of the conference on rational animals has been designated a "brainstorming" session, I will take philosopher's license, presenting no more than the softest sort of intuitive evidence for these ideas
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
|Through your library|
References found in this work BETA
No references found.
Citations of this work BETA
Susan Hurley (2008). The Shared Circuits Model (SCM): How Control, Mirroring, and Simulation Can Enable Imitation, Deliberation, and Mindreading. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 31 (1):1-22.
Santiago Arango-Muñoz (2014). The Nature of Epistemic Feelings. Philosophical Psychology 27 (2):1-19.
Robert W. Lurz (2011). Belief Attribution in Animals: On How to Move Forward Conceptually and Empirically. [REVIEW] Review of Philosophy and Psychology 2 (1):19-59.
Hans-Johann Glock (2009). Can Animals Act For Reasons? Inquiry 52 (3):232-254.
Similar books and articles
John E. Fleming (1985). A Suggested Approach to Linking Decision Styles with Business Ethics. Journal of Business Ethics 4 (2):137-144.
William J. Rapaport (2011). How to Study: A Brief Guide. World Wide Web.
Mary Douglas (1996). Thought Styles: Critical Essays on Good Taste. Sage Publications.
Dominic Lopes (1992). Pictures, Styles and Purposes. British Journal of Aesthetics 32 (4):330-341.
Darrell P. Rowbottom & Otávio Bueno (2011). How to Change It: Modes of Engagement, Rationality, and Stance Voluntarism. Synthese 178 (1):7-17.
Ruth Garrett Millikan (2006). Styles of Rationality. In Susan Hurley & Matthew Nudds (eds.), Rational Animals? Oxford University Press
John Wettersten (1995). Styles of Rationality. Philosophy of the Social Sciences 25 (1):69-98.
Jacques Derrida (1978). Spurs: Nietzsche's Styles = Eperons: Les Styles De Nietzsche. University of Chicago Press.
Jean-Paul Gaudillière (2004). Genesis and Development of a Biomedical Object: Styles of Thought, Styles of Work and the History of the Sex Steroids. Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part C 35 (3):525-543.
Added to index2009-01-28
Total downloads13 ( #272,266 of 1,907,063 )
Recent downloads (6 months)5 ( #162,115 of 1,907,063 )
How can I increase my downloads?