Sinnott's Philosophy of Purpose

Review of Metaphysics 11 (4):637 - 647 (1958)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

From the scientific standpoint, then, the crucial question concerning vitalism and mechanism is this: Does the belief in, or even a knowledge of, the existence of a vital principle have any scientific value? That is, can such a principle be of help in understanding phenomena scientifically, remembering that "scientific understanding" means to most scientists the ability to predict and control?

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,386

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Does 'ought' conversationally implicate 'can'?Bart Streumer - 2003 - European Journal of Philosophy 11 (2):219–228.
Non-Inferential Moral Knowledge.Elizabeth Tropman - 2011 - Acta Analytica 26 (4):355-366.
Problems for Sinnott-Armstrong's moral contrastivism.Peter Baumann - 2008 - Philosophical Quarterly 58 (232):463–470.
Contesting pyrrhonian contrastivism.Martijn Blaauw - 2008 - Philosophical Quarterly 58 (232):471–477.
Development and purpose.L. T. Hobhouse - 1913 - Grosse Pointe, Mich.,: Scholarly Press.
Cell and psyche.Edmund Ware Sinnott - 1950 - Chapel Hill,: Univ. of North Carolina Press.
Sinnott's Philosophy of Organism.Alfred P. Stiernotte - 1959 - Review of Metaphysics 12 (4):654 - 661.

Analytics

Added to PP
2011-05-29

Downloads
25 (#616,937)

6 months
1 (#1,510,037)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references