Journal of Aesthetics and Art Criticism 64 (4):471–477 (2006)
|Abstract||It is often assumed that there is a perceptual conflict in looking at a picture since one sees both a two-dimensional surface and a three-dimensional scene simultaneously. In this paper, I argue that it is a mistake to think that looking at pictures requires the visual system to perform the special task of reconciling inconsistent impressions of space, or competing information from different depth cues. To the contrary, I suggest that there are good reasons to think that the perception of depth in pictures is achieved in much the same way as is the perception of depth in any ordinary case.|
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Through your library||Configure|
Similar books and articles
Thomas Talbott (1995). Three Pictures of God In Western Theology. Faith and Philosophy 12 (1):79-94.
Jennifer Matey (2012). Representing the Impossible. Philosophical Psychology 26 (2):188 - 206.
Lex Newman (2009). Ideas, Pictures, and the Directness of Perception in Descartes and Locke. Philosophy Compass 4 (1):134-154.
G. Currie (2011). The Irony in Pictures. British Journal of Aesthetics 51 (2):149-167.
Birgitta Dresp (2003). Double, Double, Toil and Trouble – Fire Burn, and Theory Bubble! Behavioral and Brain Sciences 26 (4):409-410.
Axel Randrup (2003). Relations Between Three-Dimensional, Volumetric Experiences, and Neural Processes: Limitations of Materialism. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 26 (4):422-422.
Christian Lotz (2007). Depiction and Plastic Perception. A Critique of Husserl's Theory of Picture Consciousness. Continental Philosophy Review 40 (2):171-185.
John Zeimbekis (2010). Pictures and Singular Thought. Journal of Aesthetics and Art Criticism 68 (1):11-21.
Bence Nanay (2011). Perceiving Pictures. Phenomenology and the Cognitive Sciences 10 (4):461-480.
Added to index2009-01-28
Total downloads57 ( #17,748 of 556,837 )
Recent downloads (6 months)18 ( #3,864 of 556,837 )
How can I increase my downloads?