The constant gardener revisited: The effect ofsocial blackmail on the marketing concept,innovation, and entrepreneurship [Book Review]
David Bourget (Western Ontario)
David Chalmers (ANU, NYU)
Rafael De Clercq
Jack Alan Reynolds
Learn more about PhilPapers
Journal of Business Ethics 41 (3):287 - 295 (2002)
This paper discusses how adoption of the social dimensions of the marketing concept may unintentionally restrict innovation and corporate entrepreneurship, ultimately reducing social welfare. The impact of social marketing on innovation and entrepreneurship is discussed using the case of multinational pharmaceutical firms that are under pressure when marketing HIV treatments in poor countries.The argument this paper supports is that social welfare may eventually be diminished if forced social responsibility is imposed. The case of providing subsidized AIDS medication to less developed nations is used to illustrate how social blackmail may result in less innovation, entrepreneurship, and product development efforts by the pharmaceutical industry, ultimately reducing social welfare.
|Keywords||corporate entrepreneurship and social responsibility innovation and ethics innovation and public policy|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
|Through your library|
References found in this work BETA
No references found.
Citations of this work BETA
Jamal A. Al-Khatib, Mohammed Y. A. Rawwas & Scott J. Vitell (2004). Organizational Ethics in Developing Countries: A Comparative Analysis. [REVIEW] Journal of Business Ethics 55 (4):309 - 322.
Linda O'Riordan & Jenny Fairbrass (2013). Managing CSR Stakeholder Engagement: A New Conceptual Framework. [REVIEW] Journal of Business Ethics 125 (1):1-25.
Belen Blanco, Encarna Guillamón-Saorín & Andrés Guiral (2013). Do Non-Socially Responsible Companies Achieve Legitimacy Through Socially Responsible Actions? The Mediating Effect of Innovation. Journal of Business Ethics 117 (1):67-83.
Paul Gibbs (2004). Marketing and the Notion of Well-Being. Business Ethics 13 (1):5–13.
Dennis M. Ray (2005). Let Them Eat Cake and the Little Purple Pill: A Rejoinder to Miles, Munilla and Covin. [REVIEW] Journal of Business Ethics 57 (2):111-119.
Similar books and articles
Robert C. Solomon (1995). Marketing Heidegger: Entrepreneurship and Corporate Practices. Inquiry 38 (1 & 2):75 – 81.
Michael Harvey, Timothy Kiessling & Miriam Moeller, A View of Entrepreneurship and Innovation From the Economist 'for All Seasons' Joseph S. Schumpeter.
Morgan P. Miles & Linda S. Munilla (2004). The Potential Impact of Social Accountability Certification on Marketing: A Short Note. [REVIEW] Journal of Business Ethics 50 (1):1-11.
Morgan P. Miles, Linda S. Munilla & Jeffrey G. Covin (2004). Innovation, Ethics, and Entrepreneurship. Journal of Business Ethics 54 (1):97-101.
Laura Radulian (2005). Marketing of Harmful Products. International Corporate Responsibility Series 2:329-357.
Russell Abratt & Diane Sacks (1988). The Marketing Challenge: Towards Being Profitable and Socially Responsible. [REVIEW] Journal of Business Ethics 7 (7):497 - 507.
Patrick J. Murphy & Susan M. Coombes (2009). A Model of Social Entrepreneurial Discovery. Journal of Business Ethics 87 (3):325 - 336.
Nancy C. Roberts (2006). Public Entrepreneurship as Social Creativity. World Futures 62 (8):595 – 609.
Nicholas Dew & Saras D. Sarasvathy (2007). Innovations, Stakeholders & Entrepreneurship. Journal of Business Ethics 74 (3):267 - 283.
Wee Liang Tan, John N. Williams & Teck Meng Tan (2005). Defining the 'Social' in 'Social Entrepreneurship': Altruism and Entrepreneurship. International Entrepreneurship and Management Journal 1:353-365.
Added to index2009-01-28
Total downloads10 ( #269,516 of 1,780,198 )
Recent downloads (6 months)1 ( #291,056 of 1,780,198 )
How can I increase my downloads?